[2007] KEHC 2956 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 2956 (KLR)

The court held that since the advocate/client costs had been taxed at KES 1,000,000, a Certificate of Taxation had been issued, there was no dispute as to the retainer, and the respondent had neither filed a reference nor opposed the application, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs. The...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 2956 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ogutu Wariuki & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Joint Liquidators-Ndumberi Farmers Co. Ltd (In Liquidation)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 895 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Outcome
Application allowed as prayed; taxed costs adopted as judgment of the court.
Judges
JL Osiemo
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Taxation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Costs Certificate of Taxation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ogutu Wariuki & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Joint Liquidators-Ndumberi Farmers Co. Ltd (In Liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs

  1. 1 Whether the taxed costs between advocate and client should be entered as judgment of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent has opposed or appealed the taxation of costs.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the advocate/client costs had been taxed at KES 1,000,000, a Certificate of Taxation had been issued, there was no dispute as to the retainer, and the respondent had neither filed a reference nor opposed the application, the applicant was entitled to judgment for the taxed costs. The application was therefore allowed as prayed, making the taxed costs the judgment of the court and awarding costs of the application to the applicant.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as prayed; taxed costs adopted as judgment of the court.

Orders

  • The costs as taxed by the Deputy Registrar between client and advocate are made judgment of the court.
  • The costs of this application are awarded to the applicant.