[2007] KEHC 565 (KLR)

[2007] KEHC 565 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant's costs had been duly taxed and certified by the Taxing Master at Kshs.1,950,000, and that the respondent had neither paid the sum nor challenged the taxation by way of reference or appeal. There was no dispute as to the retainer. The respondent, having been served, failed to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2007] KEHC 565 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ogutu Wariuki & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Joint Liquidators-Ndumberi Farmers Co. Ltd (In Liquidation)
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 193 of 1997
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application to Enter Taxed Costs as Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed as prayed. Judgment entered for taxed costs and costs of the application awarded to the applicant.
Judges
JL Osiemo
Legal Topics
Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Bill, Certificate of Taxation
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Taxation of Costs Advocate Client Bill Certificate of Taxation

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ogutu Wariuki & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Joint Liquidators-Ndumberi Farmers Co. Ltd (In Liquidation)

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Unopposed Application to Enter Taxed Costs as Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the taxed costs between advocate and client should be entered as judgment of the court.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant's costs had been duly taxed and certified by the Taxing Master at Kshs.1,950,000, and that the respondent had neither paid the sum nor challenged the taxation by way of reference or appeal. There was no dispute as to the retainer. The respondent, having been served, failed to oppose the application or appear in court. In the absence of opposition and in light of the clear statutory provisions, the court allowed the application as prayed, entering judgment for the taxed costs and awarding the applicant the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

Application allowed as prayed. Judgment entered for taxed costs and costs of the application awarded to the applicant.

Orders

  • The costs as taxed by the Taxing Master between client and advocate are made judgment of the court.
  • The applicant is awarded the costs of this application.