[1998] KECA 250 (KLR)

[1998] KECA 250 (KLR)

The court held that since Siaya County Council had been lawfully dissolved prior to the General Elections, the applicant's position as councillor and chairman was extinguished by operation of law. It would be illogical to assert that the applicant's chairmanship survived the dissolution. Consequently, the intended...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[1998] KECA 250 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Oiro Obwa; Respondent: The Clerk to Council, Siaya County Council
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
? 22 of 1998
Procedural Posture
Civil Application / Application for Ex Parte Order Pending Intended Appeal
Outcome
application dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
Interlocutory Injunctions, Local Authorities Dissolution
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Interlocutory Injunctions Local Authorities Dissolution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Oiro Obwa

Applicant

The Clerk to Council, Siaya County Council

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Application / Application for Ex Parte Order Pending Intended Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to an order restraining the respondent from interfering with his access to and exercise of duties as chairman of Siaya County Council after the council's dissolution.
  2. 2 Whether the intended appeal raises arguable grounds.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since Siaya County Council had been lawfully dissolved prior to the General Elections, the applicant's position as councillor and chairman was extinguished by operation of law. It would be illogical to assert that the applicant's chairmanship survived the dissolution. Consequently, the intended appeal lacked any arguable grounds, and the application for interlocutory relief was frivolous and without merit. The court therefore dismissed the application with costs.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs

Orders

  • The application is dismissed with costs to the respondent.