[2025] KEHC 7408 (KLR)
The court found that, in the interest of access to justice as enshrined in Article 48 of the Constitution, and pursuant to the powers granted under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, it was appropriate to transfer the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts. The court exercised its discretion to ensure...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 7408 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Stephen Omondi Ojal; Respondent: Kentila Farms Limited; Respondent: Bengali Shayamal; Respondent: Humphrey Nyaroche
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Transfer of Suit
- Outcome
- Application for transfer of suit allowed; file transferred from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts.
- Judges
- A Mabeya
- Legal Topics
- Transfer of Suit, Jurisdiction, Access to Justice
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Stephen Omondi Ojal
Applicant
Kentila Farms Limited
Respondent
Bengali Shayamal
Respondent
Humphrey Nyaroche
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Transfer of Suit
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court should transfer the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
- 2 Whether the transfer is necessary to promote access to justice under Article 48 of the Constitution.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, in the interest of access to justice as enshrined in Article 48 of the Constitution, and pursuant to the powers granted under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act, it was appropriate to transfer the suit from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts. The court exercised its discretion to ensure that the matter would be heard in the most suitable forum, thereby facilitating the efficient and fair administration of justice. The absence of opposition from the respondents and the consideration of geographical jurisdiction further supported the decision to transfer the suit.
Court Disposition
Application for transfer of suit allowed; file transferred from Maseno Law Courts to Kombewa Law Courts.
Orders
- The file is withdrawn from Maseno Law Courts and transferred to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
- Mention on 9/6/2025 before the Head of Station, Kombewa Law Court for further directions.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Ojal v Kentila Farms Limited & 2 others (Civil Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2025) [2025] KEHC 7408 (KLR) (3 June 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 7408 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Civil Miscellaneous Application 12 of 2025
A Mabeya, J
June 3, 2025
Between
Stephen Omondi Ojal
Plaintiff
and
Kentila Farms Limited
1st Defendant
Bengali Shayamal
2nd Defendant
Humphrey Nyaroche
3rd Defendant
Ruling
1. I have considered the geographical jurisdiction of the Magistrate’s Courts of Maseno and Kombewa. In accordance with the principle of access to justice under Article 48 of the Constitution of Kenya, I hereby exercise the jurisdiction of this Court under section 18 of the Civil Procedure Act and hereby have this file withdrawn from Maseno Law Courts and transferred to Kombewa Law Courts for hearing and determination.
2. Mention on 9/6/2025 before the Head of Station, Kombewa Law Court for further directions.
3. This file is marked as closed.It is so ordered.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 3RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025. A. MABEYA, FCI, ArbJUDGE.