[2023] KEBPRT 1122 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the landlord's evidence in support of the notice to terminate the tenancy was uncontroverted, as the tenant did not attend court to challenge or rebut the allegations. The Tribunal held that the grounds set out in the notice—refusal to sign an agreement, erection of illegal structures,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEBPRT 1122 (KLR)
- Parties
- Tenant: Peter Bodol Okal T/A Bodo General Hardware; Landlord: Wycliffe Nyakundi Of Befama House
- Court
- Business Premises Rent Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case E179 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Tribunal Reference / Ruling
- Outcome
- Tenant's reference dismissed; tenancy terminated; tenant to vacate within 90 days; costs to landlord.
- Judges
- CN Mugambi
- Legal Topics
- Controlled Tenancy, Termination of Tenancy, Rent Arrears, Illegal Structures, Tenant Eviction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Bodol Okal T/A Bodo General Hardware
Tenant
Wycliffe Nyakundi Of Befama House
Landlord
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Reference / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the landlord's notice to terminate the tenancy should be approved.
- 2 Whether the tenant's reference opposing the termination has merit.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the landlord's evidence in support of the notice to terminate the tenancy was uncontroverted, as the tenant did not attend court to challenge or rebut the allegations. The Tribunal held that the grounds set out in the notice—refusal to sign an agreement, erection of illegal structures, obstruction, harassment, rent arrears, and abusive language—were sufficient and unchallenged. Consequently, the Tribunal approved the landlord's notice, dismissed the tenant's reference, and ordered termination of the tenancy with a ninety-day period for the tenant to vacate, during which rent remains payable. Failure to vacate would entitle the landlord to seek eviction through a...
Court Disposition
Tenant's reference dismissed; tenancy terminated; tenant to vacate within 90 days; costs to landlord.
Orders
- The landlord's notice to terminate tenancy is allowed.
- The tenant's reference is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
Okal t/a Bodo General Hardware v Nyakundi of Befama House (Tribunal Case E179 of 2021) [2023] KEBPRT 1122 (KLR) (15 December 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEBPRT 1122 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Business Premises Rent Tribunal
Tribunal Case E179 of 2021
Cyprian Mugambi Nguthari, Chair
December 15, 2023
Between
Peter Bodol Okal T/A Bodo General Hardware
Tenant
and
Wycliffe Nyakundi Of Befama House
Landlord
Ruling
Introduction 1. The landlord’s notice to terminate the tenancy between the parties herein is the one dated 4. 3.2021 with an effective date of 1. 6.2021. The grounds for termination as set out in the notice are as follows:-a.Refusal to sign the contractual agreement for two years.b.Obstruction of corridors by erecting illegal structures.c.Harassment of other tenants.d.Accumulation of rent arrears.e.Abusive language.
2. The tenant while opposing the landlord’s notice to terminate tenancy filed a reference to the Tribunal under Section 6 of Cap 301, dated 1. 4.2021.
3. After many false starts and failed negotiations, the matter finally proceeded for hearing on the 14. 11. 2021.
The Landlord’s case 4. The landlord testified on 14. 11. 2023 and sought and was allowed to rely on his witness statement and list of documents filed in court. The request was allowed, the statement adopted as his evidence and the documents produced as the landlord’s exhibits 1, 2, 3 and 4.
5. The landlord in his statement has stated that the tenant has erected illegal structures on the demised premises contrary to an agreement that the tenant was not to build any illegal structures outside the shop (suit premises).
6. The landlord has further stated that the tenant has been blocking other tenants’ premises by parking his vehicle outside their premises as a result of which some tenants have vacated the premises and others have threatened to vacate.
7. The landlord also states that he has approached the tenant to rectify the situation but the tenant has turned abusive.
8. The landlord therefore issued a notice to the tenant to terminate his tenancy effective 1. 6.2021 and the tenant has not opposed the notice.
The Tenant’s case 9. Although the tenant has filed his statement in support of his reference, he did not attend court to give any evidence during the hearing. Consequently, the evidence of the landlord in support of his notice to terminate tenancy remains unchallenged.
Determination 10. The only issue for determination is whether the landlord’s notice to terminate tenancy ought to be approved.
11. Having found the evidence of the landlord to be uncontroverted, I will allow the landlord’s notice to terminate the tenancy and the reference by the tenant to the Tribunal is hereby dismissed.
12. Consequently, the tenancy between the parties is hereby terminated and the tenant is to vacate the suit premises within the next ninety (90) days from the date of this ruling.
13. The tenant will continue to pay rent during this period of ninety (90) days.
14. Further, the tenant failing to vacate, the landlord will be at liberty to have the tenant forcefully evicted using a licensed auctioneer.
15. The tenant will bear the costs of the reference.
RULING DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY THIS 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2023. HON. CYPRIAN N. MUGAMBI- CHAIRPERSON 15. 12. 2023