[2025] KEHC 2075 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had previously sought similar relief in Nakuru Misc. Criminal Application No. E083 of 2023, which was dismissed, and that no new issues or circumstances had been presented to warrant a review of the sentence. However, the court noted that section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 2075 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Momanyi Okari; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nakuru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application E132 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- application dismissed with modification of commencement date of sentence
- Judges
- HI Ong'udi
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Defilement Offence, Sexual Offences Act, Application of Section 333 2 Cpc
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Momanyi Okari
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to a review of his sentence of 22 years imprisonment for defilement.
- 2 Whether section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code should be applied to the applicant's sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had previously sought similar relief in Nakuru Misc. Criminal Application No. E083 of 2023, which was dismissed, and that no new issues or circumstances had been presented to warrant a review of the sentence. However, the court noted that section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code had not been applied at any stage of the proceedings. Consequently, while the application for review was dismissed for lack of merit, the court ordered that the applicant's sentence of 22 years imprisonment should run from 15th February, 2016, the date he was first arraigned in court, in compliance with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Court Disposition
application dismissed with modification of commencement date of sentence
Orders
- The application for review of sentence is dismissed.
- The sentence of 22 years imprisonment shall run from 15th February, 2016, the date the applicant was first arraigned in court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
27 paragraphs
Okari v Republic (Criminal Miscellaneous Application E132 of 2023) [2025] KEHC 2075 (KLR) (13 February 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 2075 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Nakuru
Criminal Miscellaneous Application E132 of 2023
HI Ong'udi, J
February 13, 2025
Between
Peter Momanyi Okari
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. The Applicant – Peter Momanyi Okari, filed this undated notice of motion seeking a review of his sentence of 22 years imprisonment vide Nakuru Chief Magistrate’s Court Criminal Case No. 33 of 2016. He had been convicted of the offence of defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 on 28th October, 2016.
2. In his supporting affidavit he averred that this court had jurisdiction to deal with this matter and in line with the decision in Phillip Muceke Maingi Machakos Petition no. E017 of 2021.
3. M/s Okok Counsel for the respondent opposed the application saying the High court had handled a similar application in Nakuru Misc. Criminal Application No E083 of 2023 after the applicants Appeal No. 166 of 2016 had been unsuccessful. In the said Misc. Criminal Application High Court No. 4 found the application to be unmerited. She thus asked the court to dismiss the present application for being an abuse of the court process.
4. The record is clear on the sequence of events in this matter as follows: The Applicant was on 28th October, 2016 convicted of the offence of defilement contrary to section 8(1) as read with section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act No. 3 of 2006 vide Nakuru Chief Magistrate’s Criminal Case No. 33 of 2016.
He was sentenced to serve twenty two (22) years imprisonment.
Being dissatisfied, he filed Nakuru HCCRA No. 166 of 2016 which was heard and dismissed by Mutende J on 19th May, 2019.
Again, being dissatisfied he filed Court of Appeal Nakuru Criminal Appeal No. 114 of 2014. He however withdrew the Appeal on 16th September. 2020.
He again filed Nakuru Misc. Criminal Application No. E083 of 2023 seeking re-sentencing. The application was heard and dismissed by Gichohi J on 14th May, 2024.
5. The Applicant is now before this court seeking similar orders as those in Misc. Application No. E083 of 2023. There is nothing new that has come up nor been brought to the court’s attention which was not within the knowledge of the other superior courts to warrant a review of the sentence.
6. The only issue I have noted is that there was no application of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code by either the Magistrate’s Court, High Court on Appeal or High Court at the Revision level. Save for that I find no merit in the application. The sentence of 22 year imprisonment remains in force with an order that it runs from 15th February, 2016 when the applicant was first arraigned in court.
7. The application is otherwise dismissed.
8. Orders accordingly.
DELIVERED, VIRTUALLY, DATED AND SIGNED THIS 13TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 IN OPEN COURT AT NAKURU.H. I. ONG’UDIJUDGE