[2022] KEHC 14236 (KLR)
The court found that the trial magistrate failed to consider the period the applicant spent in remand custody prior to sentencing, as mandated by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. There was no evidence that the applicant escaped from custody or was released on bond during trial. The court therefore...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 14236 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Kelvin Otieno Okendo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E024 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Remand Period Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Remand Period Credit, Sexual Offences, Assault, Criminal Procedure, Prison Terms
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Kelvin Otieno Okendo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Consideration of Remand Period Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial court erred by failing to take into account the period the applicant spent in remand custody when sentencing, as required by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the trial magistrate failed to consider the period the applicant spent in remand custody prior to sentencing, as mandated by section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. There was no evidence that the applicant escaped from custody or was released on bond during trial. The court therefore ordered that the sentences imposed for rape and assault causing actual bodily harm, which were to run concurrently, be computed from the applicant's date of arrest, February 27, 2017, thereby crediting the remand period against the total sentence. This ensures compliance with statutory requirements and fairness in sentencing.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The sentences of 10 years for rape and 1 year for assault causing actual bodily harm, to run concurrently, shall be calculated from the date of arrest, February 27, 2017, taking into account the period spent in remand custody.
- Order to be served upon the ODPP and officer in charge Kisumu Medium Prison.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
Okendo v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E024 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 14236 (KLR) (21 September 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 14236 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E024 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
September 21, 2022
Between
Kelvin Otieno Okendo
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. This application was filed into court on February 24, 2022 by the convict applicant Kelvin Otieno Okendo who is serving a prison term of 10 years and 1 year for the offence of rape contrary to section 3(1) (a) (b) (3) of the Sexual Offences Act and assault causing actual bodily harm respectively.
2. He was sentenced on September 11, 2018 by Hon J R Ngarngar, Chief Magistrate in Kisumu Chief Magistrate’s sexual offence case No 1 of 2017.
3. The applicant has not indicated in his application dated February 24, 2022 whether he appealed against the conviction and sentence or not.
4. However, in his application, he claims that he was arrested and placed in remand custody on February 27, 2017 to September 11, 2018 when he was sentenced and that the trial court did not take into account the period that the convict has spent in remand custody, in meting out the prison term as required under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
5. I have considered the application which has for no apparent reasons recorded, been pending in court for almost one year now. There is no opposition to the application. Upon perusal of the committal warrant issued on September 11, 2018, I am in agreement with the convict/applicant herein that the learned trial magistrate did not take into account the period spend in prison remand custody by the convict in sentencing him.
6. There is further no material to show that the convict herein escaped from lawful custody during the trial or that he was granted bond and that he was on bond pending trial.
7. For the above reasons, I find the application dated February 24, 2022 merited. I grant it and order that the 10 years’ imprisonment and the 1-year imprisonment imposed on the convict Kevin Otieno Okendo for the offences of rape and assault causing actual bodily harm respectively, and which sentences were ordered to run concurrently, shall be calculated from the date of arrest of the convict on February 27, 2017, therefore taking into account the period that the convict had spent in remand custody pending the trial, conviction and sentence on September 11, 2018. This order to be served upon the ODPP and officer in charge Kisumu Medium Prison.
8. I so order.
9. File closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 21ST DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022R. E. ABURILIJUDGE