[2014] KEHC 2507 (KLR)
The court found that the application for substitution was merited as the County Council of Isiolo had ceased to exist and was succeeded by the County Government of Isiolo pursuant to changes in law. Since the application was not opposed, and the substitution was necessary for the proper continuation of proceedings,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2014] KEHC 2507 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Okero Gilbert Ombachi practising as G. O Ombachi & Co. Advocates; Respondent: County Council of Isiolo
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Meru
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Civil Application 88 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Substitution Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed as prayed.
- Judges
- FM Njoroge
- Legal Topics
- Party Substitution, Costs in Cause
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Okero Gilbert Ombachi practising as G. O Ombachi & Co. Advocates
Applicant
County Council of Isiolo
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Substitution Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the County Council of Isiolo should be substituted with the County Government of Isiolo as respondent.
- 2 Whether costs of the application should be in the cause.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the application for substitution was merited as the County Council of Isiolo had ceased to exist and was succeeded by the County Government of Isiolo pursuant to changes in law. Since the application was not opposed, and the substitution was necessary for the proper continuation of proceedings, the court allowed the application and ordered that costs be in the cause.
Court Disposition
Application allowed as prayed.
Orders
- The County Council of Isiolo is substituted with the County Government of Isiolo as respondent.
- Costs of the application to be in the cause.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MERU
MISC. CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 88 OF 2012
OKERO GILBERT OMBACHI PRACTISING AS
G. O OMBACHI & CO. ADVOCATES...............................APPLICANT/ADVOCATE
VERSUS
COUNTY COUNCIL OF ISIOLO.............................................RESPONDENT/CLIENT
RULING
This application is dated 14. 2.2014 and seeks orders:
THATthe respondent herein County Council of Isiolo be substituted with the County government of Isiolo
THATthe costs of this application be in the cause.
The application is not opposed. It is therefore allowed.
It is so ordered.
Delivered in Open Court at Meru this 18th day of June, 2014 in the presence of:
Cc. Lilian/Daniel
Ondari h/b Ombachi for Applicants
Nyenyire h/b Mbaabu Inoti for Respondent
P. M. NJOROGE
JUDGE