[2023] KEHC 19317 (KLR)
The court found that since there were no pleadings or physical file available for consideration in the Case Tracking System records, it could not proceed with the matter. Consequently, the file was marked as closed.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 19317 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Willis Odhiambo Okoko; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Revision E002 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Revision / Ruling
- Outcome
- file closed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Case Tracking System, Missing Pleadings, File Closure
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Willis Odhiambo Okoko
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can proceed in the absence of pleadings or a physical file for consideration.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since there were no pleadings or physical file available for consideration in the Case Tracking System records, it could not proceed with the matter. Consequently, the file was marked as closed.
Court Disposition
file closed
Orders
- The file is hereby marked as closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
18 paragraphs
Okoko v Republic (Criminal Revision E002 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 19317 (KLR) (26 June 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 19317 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Revision E002 of 2021
RE Aburili, J
June 26, 2023
Between
Willis Odhiambo Okoko
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
Ruling
1. This file herein exists in the Case Tracking System records, but with no pleading or physical file for consideration by this court.
2. Accordingly, this file is hereby marked as closed.
3. I so order.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kisumu this 26th Day of June, 2023R. E. ABURILIJUDGE