[2023] KEHC 1777 (KLR)
The court held that, in accordance with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing must be considered in determining the length of his imprisonment. The trial court's failure to account for this period necessitated an order for the prison authorities...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 1777 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Dick Onyango Okoth Alias Deno; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Petition E007 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Petition / Resentencing Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Prison term to be computed taking into account period spent in custody.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Custodial Sentence, Pretrial Custody, Sentence Calculation
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Dick Onyango Okoth Alias Deno
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Petition / Resentencing Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be considered in computing the applicant's sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, in accordance with section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the period the applicant spent in custody prior to sentencing must be considered in determining the length of his imprisonment. The trial court's failure to account for this period necessitated an order for the prison authorities to recalculate the applicant's sentence to reflect the time already served in custody. The applicant is required to provide the relevant trial court proceedings to the prison authorities to confirm the period spent in custody.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Prison term to be computed taking into account period spent in custody.
Orders
- The prison term imposed on the applicant in Ukwala PM SO E019/2021 shall take into account the period he was in prison custody as stipulated in section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- The applicant to avail to prisons authorities trial court proceedings to confirm the period spent in custody.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Okoth Alias Deno v Republic (Criminal Petition E007 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 1777 (KLR) (28 February 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 1777 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Criminal Petition E007 of 2023
RE Aburili, J
February 28, 2023
Between
Dick Onyango Okoth Alias Deno
Petitioner
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an Application for resentencing from Ukwala PM SO E019/2021)
Ruling
1. The applicant claims that he was sentenced to serve 10 years imprisonment and that the trial court never took into account the period he spent in custody. That he never appealed as he was satisfied with the conviction and sentence.
2. I have considered the application. I order that the prison term imposed on the applicant in Ukwala PM SO E019/2021 shall take into account the period he was in prison custody as stipulated in section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
3. The applicant to avail to prisons authorities trial court proceedings to confirm said the period.
4. I so order.
5. File closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 28THDAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023R.E. ABURILIJUDGE