[2022] KEELRC 89 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 89 (KLR)

The court found that errors had affected the matter from the time it was scheduled for defence hearing to its dismissal. Both parties failed to appear on several occasions, but the applicant demonstrated efforts to have the matter heard and provided explanations for his absence, including the impact of the Covid-19...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 89 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Isaiah Odhiambo Okoth; Respondent: New Kenya Co-operative Creameries Ltd
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 1767 of 2015
Procedural Posture
Review Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit
Outcome
Application allowed; suit reinstated and set for mention for defence hearing date allocation.
Judges
Nzioki wa Makau
Legal Topics
Reinstatement of Suit, Dismissal for Non Attendance, Review of Court Orders
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Reinstatement of Suit Dismissal for Non Attendance Review of Court Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Isaiah Odhiambo Okoth

Applicant

New Kenya Co-operative Creameries Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Review Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal and Reinstate Suit

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of the suit for non-attendance should be reviewed and set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be reinstated and set down for hearing.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that errors had affected the matter from the time it was scheduled for defence hearing to its dismissal. Both parties failed to appear on several occasions, but the applicant demonstrated efforts to have the matter heard and provided explanations for his absence, including the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic and attempts to communicate with the court. In the interests of justice, and since the claimant's case had already been closed, the court exercised its discretion to reinstate the suit and set it down for mention before another court for allocation of a defence hearing date. Costs of the application were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; suit reinstated and set for mention for defence hearing date allocation.

Orders

  • The dismissal of the suit on 17th March 2021 is reviewed and set aside.
  • The suit is reinstated and set for mention before any other court to allocate a date for defence hearing.