[2022] KEHC 13535 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant failed to provide any evidence of pauperism or inability to pay the required court fees. As a result, the application for leave to appeal as a pauper under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules was dismissed. The court directed that the applicant should have the proceedings and...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KEHC 13535 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Nicholas Wadhala Okoth; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E070 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal as a Pauper
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Leave to Appeal, Pauper Appeal, Court Fees, Criminal Conviction, Murder Offence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Wadhala Okoth
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Leave to Appeal as a Pauper
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant has demonstrated pauperism to warrant leave to appeal as a pauper under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to exemption from payment of court fees for the appeal process.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant failed to provide any evidence of pauperism or inability to pay the required court fees. As a result, the application for leave to appeal as a pauper under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules was dismissed. The court directed that the applicant should have the proceedings and judgment assessed for payment of the necessary court fees and for preparation of the court record. The absence of evidence supporting pauper status was determinative.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for leave to appeal as a pauper is dismissed.
- The applicant to have the proceedings and judgment assessed for him to pay the required court fees and for preparation of the court record.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
19 paragraphs
Okoth v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E070 of 2022) [2022] KEHC 13535 (KLR) (5 October 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KEHC 13535 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E070 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
October 5, 2022
Between
Nicholas Wadhala Okoth
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an Application for leave to file an appeal under Rule 113 of the Court of Appeal Rules against Judgment, conviction and sentence in Siaya High Court Cr. Case No. E002 of 2022 on 26/4/2022)
Ruling
1. The applicant herein was convicted for the offence of murder on April 26, 2022. I have considered the application to file an appeal as a pauper. I find no evidence of pauperism to warrant grant of orders sought under rule 113 of theCourt of Appeal Rules.
2. The application for leave to appeal as a pauper is dismissed. The applicant to have the proceedings and judgment assessed for him to pay the required court fees and for preparation of the court record.
3. File closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 5TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022R.E. ABURILIJUDGE