[2023] KEHC 17673 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had served 14 years in prison for the offence of defilement, which was a substantial portion of the original 20-year sentence. The court noted that the applicant's mitigation was not considered at sentencing due to the mandatory minimum sentence under the Sexual Offences Act....
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 17673 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Obed Peter Okwemba; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E030 of 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Resentencing Application After Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- application allowed; sentence reduced to period served; applicant released
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Resentencing, Sexual Offences Act, Mandatory Minimum Sentences, Mitigation, Defilement, Sentence Reduction
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Obed Peter Okwemba
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Resentencing Application After Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to resentencing in light of the period already served in prison.
- 2 Whether the mandatory minimum sentence under the Sexual Offences Act precluded consideration of mitigation.
- 3 Whether the sentence already served is sufficient punishment for the offence committed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had served 14 years in prison for the offence of defilement, which was a substantial portion of the original 20-year sentence. The court noted that the applicant's mitigation was not considered at sentencing due to the mandatory minimum sentence under the Sexual Offences Act. Taking into account the applicant's remorse, the period already served, and the objectives of punishment, the court held that the sentence already served was sufficient. The court therefore reduced the original sentence to the period already served and ordered the applicant's immediate release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
application allowed; sentence reduced to period served; applicant released
Orders
- The sentence of twenty (20) years imprisonment is reduced to fourteen (14) years imprisonment already served.
- Unless otherwise lawfully held, the applicant Obed Peter Okwemba is set at liberty forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Okwemba v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E030 of 2021) [2023] KEHC 17673 (KLR) (23 May 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 17673 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E030 of 2021
RE Aburili, J
May 23, 2023
Between
Obed Peter Okwemba
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(From the original conviction and sentence in Senior Principal Magistrate’s Court Sexual Offences Case No. 952 of 2009 at Maseno)
Ruling
1. The applicant Obed Peter Okwemba was convicted and sentenced to serve twenty (20) years imprisonment vide Maseno Senior Principal Magistrate Sexual Offence Case No 952 of 2009, on October 15, 2010.
2. He filed Kisumu HCCR application No E030 of 2021 seeking for resentencing and on March 16, 2022, the matter was transferred to Kakamega High Court for hearing and determination under the mistaken belief that the conviction was before Vihiga Magistrate’s Court.
3. Kakamega High Court vide HCCR miscellaneous application No E016 od 2022 did re-transfer back to Kisumu the matter on May 16, 2023 owing to supervisory jurisdiction.
4. I have considered the application together with the supporting affidavit of the convict/applicant. The applicant is remorseful. He has been in prison now close to 14 years from 2009. He was sentenced on October 15, 2010.
5. In my view, the purpose of punishment and sentencing has been achieved as the convict has served 14 years in prison and he has learnt his lessons following deprivation of liberty for that long for the offence of defilement under section 8(1) as read with section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act. The complainant was 16 years old. The offence was heinous but the convict has in my view paid for his sins in prison.
6. Although he was handed ‘mandatory’ minimum sentence which was lawful, the convict has served a substantial part of that sentence noting that his mitigations were not considered on account of the mandatory nature of the sentences provided for in the Sexual Offences Act. The convict was 20 years old at the time of his conviction, according to the prisons records. It is however not clear whether this was his age as at 2009 or 2010 when he was convicted.
7. I allow the application filed on February 10, 2021 and order that the sentence of fourteen (14) years imprisonment already served is sufficient. Therefore, unless otherwise lawfully held, the convict Obed Peter Okwemba is hereby set at liberty forthwith, following the order that the twenty (20) years imprisonment is hereby reduced to the 14 years’ imprisonment already served, calculated from the date of his arrest in 2009.
8. I so order.
9. File closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2023R. E. ABURILIJUDGE