[2024] KEHC 9964 (KLR)
The High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction to revise a lawful sentence imposed by the trial court through an application for revision, unless there is a demonstrated illegality, incorrectness, or impropriety in the sentence. The applicant's arguments regarding reformation, orphan status, and the alleged...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 9964 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Peter Musumba Okwemba; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E111 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Sentence Revision, Mandatory Sentencing, Constitutionality of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Peter Musumba Okwemba
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court can revise a mandatory death sentence imposed for robbery with violence through an application for sentence rehearing.
- 2 Whether the mandatory death sentence under section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction to revise a lawful sentence imposed by the trial court through an application for revision, unless there is a demonstrated illegality, incorrectness, or impropriety in the sentence. The applicant's arguments regarding reformation, orphan status, and the alleged unconstitutionality of the mandatory death sentence did not meet the threshold for revision under section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court emphasized that challenges to the constitutionality of mandatory sentences must be brought through proper constitutional petitions, not by way of revision applications. Consequently, the application was dismissed for lack of merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application for sentence revision is declined and dismissed.
- This file is closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Okwemba v Republic (Criminal Application E111 of 2024) [2024] KEHC 9964 (KLR) (12 August 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 9964 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Criminal Application E111 of 2024
RE Aburili, J
August 12, 2024
Between
Peter Musumba Okwemba
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(From the original conviction and sentence in Maseno SPM Criminal Case No. 809 of 2013)
Ruling
1. The applicant is a convict on two counts of robbery with violence contrary to section 296(2) of the Penal Code and was sentenced to death on both counts. He appealed vide Kisumu HCRA No. 55, 56 and 57 of 2015 which appeal was dismissed. He now seeks sentence rehearing on account that he has reformed as per the life skills that he has acquired in prison as annexed. That he is a total orphan who lost his mother in January this year.
2. The application is for revision of sentence which the applicant alleges is mandatory and unconstitutional.
3. I have considered the application and the grounds as argued and the lengthy submissions and documents annexed. That court is unable to revise lawful sentence through an application.
4. The application is declined and dismissed.
5. Signal to issue.
6. This file is closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 12TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2024R.E. ABURILIJUDGE