[2024] KEELC 4172 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 4172 (KLR)

The application for injunctive relief was rendered moot because it only sought orders pending the inter partes hearing, and by the time of hearing, there was no longer a live controversy requiring the court's intervention. The applicant failed to comply with clear court orders for enforcement of the judgment, and...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 4172 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Penina Lynet Olumatia; 1st Defendant: Lukas Orende Opake; 2nd Defendant: Protus Ombaka Shitubi
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Kakamega
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 477 of 2014
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application
Outcome
application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff
Judges
DO Ohungo
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Enforcement of Judgment, Land Title Cancellation, Specific Performance
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Injunctive Relief Enforcement of Judgment Land Title Cancellation Specific Performance

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Penina Lynet Olumatia

Plaintiff

Lukas Orende Opake

1st Defendant

Protus Ombaka Shitubi

2nd Defendant

Procedural Posture

Notice of Motion / Ruling on Interlocutory Application

  1. 1 Whether the Notice of Motion dated 27th September 2023 seeking injunctive relief presents a live controversy for determination.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to an injunction restraining implementation of the County Surveyor's report after the judgment and enforcement orders have been executed.

Ratio Decidendi

The application for injunctive relief was rendered moot because it only sought orders pending the inter partes hearing, and by the time of hearing, there was no longer a live controversy requiring the court's intervention. The applicant failed to comply with clear court orders for enforcement of the judgment, and the actions of the County Land Registrar and Surveyor were in execution of those orders. The court found no merit in the application, as the applicant's complaints were raised too late and did not present any justiciable issue. The application was dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.

Court Disposition

application dismissed with costs to the plaintiff

Orders

  • Notice of Motion dated 27th September 2023 is dismissed with costs to the plaintiff.