[2024] KEHC 11859 (KLR)

[2024] KEHC 11859 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant was released on bond shortly after arraignment and remained out on bond during the trial until the bond was cancelled pending mitigation and sentencing. As such, the applicant did not spend any significant period in custody prior to sentencing that would warrant application of...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEHC 11859 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Amon Onyango Oluoch; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kericho
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E055 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
JK Sergon
Legal Topics
Sentencing Procedure, Pre Sentence Custody, Robbery With Violence, Application of Section 333 2, Enhancement of Sentence
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Procedure Pre Sentence Custody Robbery With Violence Application of Section 333 2 Enhancement of Sentence

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Amon Onyango Oluoch

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application Under Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in custody prior to sentencing included in the computation of his sentence under section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant was released on bond shortly after arraignment and remained out on bond during the trial until the bond was cancelled pending mitigation and sentencing. As such, the applicant did not spend any significant period in custody prior to sentencing that would warrant application of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The application for inclusion of pre-sentence custody was therefore without merit and dismissed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for inclusion of the time spent in custody prior to sentencing is dismissed.