[2023] KECPT 820 (KLR)

[2023] KECPT 820 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the delay in filing the Memorandum of Appearance and Defence by the Respondent was occasioned by inadvertent misfiling of suit papers, which was not intentional or contumelious. The Tribunal emphasized the discretionary power of the court to set aside ex parte judgments to prevent injustice,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KECPT 820 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Romeo Olwal; Respondent: Baya Savings & Credit Cooperative Society
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case 660/E748 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment
Outcome
Application allowed; default judgment set aside; Respondent granted leave to defend.
Judges
BM Kimemia, J. Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
Legal Topics
Setting Aside Default Judgment, Ex Parte Judgment, Court Discretion, Procedural Fairness
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Setting Aside Default Judgment Ex Parte Judgment Court Discretion Procedural Fairness

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Romeo Olwal

Applicant

Baya Savings & Credit Cooperative Society

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Default Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the default judgment entered on 25th October 2022 against the Respondent should be set aside.
  2. 2 Whether the Respondent should be allowed to defend the suit unconditionally.
  3. 3 Whether the delay in filing the Memorandum of Appearance and Defence was excusable.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the delay in filing the Memorandum of Appearance and Defence by the Respondent was occasioned by inadvertent misfiling of suit papers, which was not intentional or contumelious. The Tribunal emphasized the discretionary power of the court to set aside ex parte judgments to prevent injustice, as established in relevant case law and statutory provisions. The Tribunal was guided by the principle that substantive justice should prevail over procedural technicalities, as enshrined in the Constitution and Civil Procedure Act. In the interest of justice, the Tribunal allowed the application to set aside the default judgment and granted the Respondent leave to defend the...

Court Disposition

Application allowed; default judgment set aside; Respondent granted leave to defend.

Orders

  • There be stay of proceedings in the matter pending hearing and determination of this Application.
  • The default judgment entered on 25th October 2022 against the Respondent is set aside and the Respondent is allowed to defend the suit unconditionally.