[2023] KEELRC 2331 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 2331 (KLR)

The Court found that the Notice of Change of Advocates filed on June 22, 2023 by Odhiambo Oronga & Co Advocates for the 1st to 4th Respondents superseded all previous notices and resolved the question of legal representation. As a result, the motions seeking to bar the Interested Party from representing the...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 2331 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Vincent Mariita Omao; Applicant: David Mangondi Senema; Respondent: Hon Paul Simba Arati; Respondent: County Government of Kisii; Respondent: County Secretary, Kisii; Respondent: Kisii County Public Service Board; Respondent: Clerk, Kisii County Assembly; Respondent: Speaker, Kisii County Assembly; Respondent: Kisii County Assembly; Interested Party: Alfred Ongiri Nyandieka
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Petition E014 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Representation and Preliminary Motions
Outcome
Motions regarding representation dismissed as overtaken by events; costs in the cause.
Judges
S Radido
Legal Topics
Public Service Appointments, Locus Standi, Conflict of Interest, Legal Representative Qualification
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Constitutional Law Public Service Appointments Locus Standi Conflict of Interest Legal Representative Qualification

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 10 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Mariita Omao

Applicant

David Mangondi Senema

Applicant

Hon Paul Simba Arati

Respondent

County Government of Kisii

Respondent

County Secretary, Kisii

Respondent

Kisii County Public Service Board

Respondent

Clerk, Kisii County Assembly

Respondent

Speaker, Kisii County Assembly

Respondent

Kisii County Assembly

Respondent

Alfred Ongiri Nyandieka

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Representation and Preliminary Motions

  1. 1 Whether the Interested Party could legally represent the 1st to 4th Respondents while being the subject of the proceedings and a potential witness.
  2. 2 Whether the Notice of Change of Advocates filed by Ochoki & Co Advocates for the 4th Respondent was valid.
  3. 3 Whether the motions regarding legal representation had been overtaken by subsequent events.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court found that the Notice of Change of Advocates filed on June 22, 2023 by Odhiambo Oronga & Co Advocates for the 1st to 4th Respondents superseded all previous notices and resolved the question of legal representation. As a result, the motions seeking to bar the Interested Party from representing the Respondents and to strike out the Notice of Change of Advocates by Ochoki & Co Advocates were rendered superfluous and overtaken by events. The Court held that the current advocate on record for the 1st to 4th Respondents is Odhiambo Oronga & Co Advocates, and there was no longer a live controversy regarding representation. Costs of the two motions were ordered to be in the cause. The...

Court Disposition

Motions regarding representation dismissed as overtaken by events; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • The Notice of Change of Advocates filed by Odhiambo Oronga & Co Advocates for the 1st to 4th Respondents is recognized as valid and supersedes previous notices.
  • The motions seeking to bar the Interested Party from representing the Respondents and to strike out the Notice of Change of Advocates by Ochoki & Co Advocates are dismissed as superfluous and overtaken by events.