[2021] KEHC 9566 (KLR)
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death penalty for robbery with violence is unconstitutional, and courts have discretion to resentence. Considering the seriousness of the offence, the manner in which it was committed, the Petitioner's mitigation, and the twelve...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2021] KEHC 9566 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Omar Bakari; Respondent: Director of Public Prosecution
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 139 of 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Resentencing Following Supreme Court Decision
- Outcome
- Death sentence set aside; Petitioner resentenced to 17 years imprisonment from date of conviction.
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Robbery With Violence, Mandatory Sentencing, Resentencing, Mitigation, Death Penalty, Constitutional Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Omar Bakari
Appellant
Director of Public Prosecution
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Resentencing Following Supreme Court Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the mandatory death sentence for robbery with violence under section 296(2) of the Penal Code is unconstitutional.
- 2 What is the appropriate sentence for the Petitioner following the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic [2017] eKLR.
- 3 Whether the Petitioner's mitigation and period already served should affect the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that, following the Supreme Court's decision in Muruatetu, the mandatory death penalty for robbery with violence is unconstitutional, and courts have discretion to resentence. Considering the seriousness of the offence, the manner in which it was committed, the Petitioner's mitigation, and the twelve years already served, the court determined that a sentence of seventeen years' imprisonment from the date of conviction is adequate punishment. The death sentence imposed by the trial court was therefore set aside and replaced with a custodial sentence.
Court Disposition
Death sentence set aside; Petitioner resentenced to 17 years imprisonment from date of conviction.
Orders
- The death sentence imposed upon the Petitioner by the trial court is set aside.
- The Petitioner is sentenced to a term of seventeen (17) years imprisonment from the date of conviction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
24 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT MOMBASA
PETITION NO. 139 OF 2018
OMAR BAKARI..............................................................PETITIONER
VERSUS
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC PROSECUTION................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. The Petitioner herein Omar Bakariwas convicted and sentenced to suffer death for the offence of robbery with violence contrary to section 296 (2) of the Penal Code.
2. The particulars being that on the 12th day of October, 2007 at around 6:15 pm at Kisauni Msikitini stage Mombasa County jointly with others not before the Court and while armed with dangerous weapons namely pangas, robbed MERCY ACHIENG SABANA of a handbag containing mobile phone make safaricom 225, perfumes, National Identity card and cash Ksh. 5,000/= all valued at Kshs. 15, 000/= and at or immediately before or immediately after the time of such robbery used actual violence to the said MERCY ACHIENG SABANA.
3. The Petitioner filed appeal to the High Court which was dismissed on 19/2/2014. The Petitioner is now in this court pursuant to the Supreme Court decision in Francis Karioko Muruatetu & Another vs. Republic [2017] eKLR in which the apex court held that the mandatory nature of the death penalty is unconstitutional. This court therefore has the jurisdiction to resentence the Petitioner.
4. The Petitioner in mitigation urged the Court to forgive him, that he was remorseful, and that he has reformed and has learnt carpentry which will enable him to be gainfully employed in a free society.
5. On her part Ms. Balongo, the learned prosecutor submitted that the offence committed by the Petitioner was grave and that he should be punished by imprisonment of 20 years in jail.
6. I have considered the petition and mitigation by the Petitioner. Robbery with violence is a serious offence against the public and the individual and when proved must be adequately punished. The Petitioner has served 12 years in prison. In the nature of the offence and how it was committed, and having heard the Petitioner in mitigation, and also having considered all aggravating circumstances, I am satisfied that a jail term of seventeen (17) years is adequate punishment for the crime.
7. I therefore make the following orders:
(a) I set aside the death sentence imposed upon the Petitioner by the trial court.
(b) In place thereof I herewith jail the Petitioner to a term of seventeen (17) years from the date of conviction.
Right of appeal in 14 days.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Mombasa this 26th dayof January, 2021.
E. K. OGOLA
JUDGE
Judgment delivered via MS Teams in the presence of:
Petitioner in person via video link
Mr. Fedha for DPP
Ms. Peris Court Assistant