[2012] KEHC 471 (KLR)
The court found that the sentence imposed on the appellant was not proportional to the offence, as it was on the higher side given the amount of money involved and the fact that obtaining by false pretenses is a misdemeanor. The court also considered the appellant's status as a first offender and the circumstances...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2012] KEHC 471 (KLR)
- Parties
- Appellant: Omar Juma Athman; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Appeal 104 of 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal_allowed_in_part
- Judges
- CW Meoli
- Legal Topics
- Obtaining by False Pretenses, Sentencing Principles, Mitigation of Sentence
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Omar Juma Athman
Appellant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the appellant for obtaining by false pretenses was proportionate to the offence committed.
- 2 Whether the appellant's status as a first offender and his efforts or lack thereof to refund the complainant's money should mitigate the sentence.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the sentence imposed on the appellant was not proportional to the offence, as it was on the higher side given the amount of money involved and the fact that obtaining by false pretenses is a misdemeanor. The court also considered the appellant's status as a first offender and the circumstances surrounding his inability to refund the complainant's money while in prison. Consequently, the court allowed the appeal on sentence and reduced the sentence to the period already served, ordering the appellant's release unless otherwise lawfully held.
Court Disposition
appeal_allowed_in_part
Orders
- The sentence is reduced to the period already served.
- The appellant is to be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Malindi
Criminal Appeal 104 of 2011 [if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-GB X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; text-autospace:ideograph-other; font-size:12. 0pt;"Liberation Serif","serif"; mso-fareast-"WenQuanYi Micro Hei";} </style> <![endif]
OMAR JUMA ATHMAN ….....................….…………APPELLANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC…………....……................……………RESPONDENT
(From original conviction and sentence in Criminal Case No. 945 of 2011 of the Senior Resident Magistrate’s Court at Malindi before Hon. A. M. Obura – SRM)
JUDGMENT
1. The appellant was convicted on his own guilty of plea for the offence of obtaining by false pretenses contrary to section 313 of the Penal Code. The particulars of the charge are that:
“On the 27th day of February, 2008 at Maweni 'B' village in Kilifi District within Coast Province with intent to defraud obtained from Catherine Katana Nuri the sum of kshs. 24,000/= by falsely pretending to sell her a plot.”
2. Through his advocate Mr. Odhiambo, he has appealed to this court on sentence alone. It would appear that upon conviction the appellant successfully sought time to refund the complainant's money, but he failed to do so. Mr. Odhiambo has urged the court to note that the appellant was a first offender and had no opportunity to make the refund while in prison. He prayed that the sentence be reduced.
3. Mr. Kemo opposed the appeal citing the apparent unwillingness by the appellant to refund the complainant's money or give her an alternative plot.
4. Having considered all the foregoing, I am of the view that the sentence was not proportional to the offence as it leans towards the higher side considering the amount of money involved and the fact that the offence is a misdemeanor.
5. Accordingly, I will allow the appeal, and reduce the sentence to the period already served. The appellant will be set at liberty unless otherwise lawfully held.
Delivered and signed this23rdday of November, 2012 in the presence of the Appellant, Mr. Kemo for the State.
Court clerk – Aisha
C. W. Meoli
JUDGE