[2002] KEHC 986 (KLR)
The court found that since the period specified in the previous orders had lapsed, there were technically no subsisting orders to extend. However, recognizing the sensitive nature of inheritance matters and the need for all heirs to participate, the court directed that all respondents be served within 30 days. The...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2002] KEHC 986 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Manthura Omar Mohamed; Applicant: Umi Omar Mohamed; Applicant: Said Omar Mohamed; Respondent: Muhiddin Omar Mohamed; Respondent: Mohamed Omar Mohamed; Respondent: Ahmed Omar Mohamed; Respondent: Abdalla Omar Mohamed; Respondent: Twahir Omar Mohamed; Respondent: Haswa Omar Mohamed; Respondent: Khadija Omar Mohamed; Respondent: Teba Omar Mohamed
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Mombasa
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Succession Cause 1 of 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Extension of Orders and Directions on Estate Administration
- Outcome
- Application for extension of orders dismissed as moot; directions issued for service and accounting.
- Legal Topics
- Succession, Estate Administration, Distribution of Estate, Accounting of Estate, Appointment of Administrator
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Manthura Omar Mohamed
Applicant
Umi Omar Mohamed
Applicant
Said Omar Mohamed
Applicant
Muhiddin Omar Mohamed
Respondent
Mohamed Omar Mohamed
Respondent
Ahmed Omar Mohamed
Respondent
Abdalla Omar Mohamed
Respondent
Twahir Omar Mohamed
Respondent
Haswa Omar Mohamed
Respondent
Khadija Omar Mohamed
Respondent
Teba Omar Mohamed
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Succession Cause / Ruling on Application for Extension of Orders and Directions on Estate Administration
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the court can extend orders previously issued after the lapse of the specified period.
- 2 Whether the applicants have properly accounted for the estate's rental income collected.
- 3 What directions should be given to ensure all heirs are served and participate in the proceedings.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that since the period specified in the previous orders had lapsed, there were technically no subsisting orders to extend. However, recognizing the sensitive nature of inheritance matters and the need for all heirs to participate, the court directed that all respondents be served within 30 days. The court emphasized the fiduciary duty of the applicants who had collected rent on behalf of the estate, ordering them to deposit all funds collected, including the Kshs.94,000/= already used, into the designated estate account and to maintain proper records. The court further set a hearing date for the pending application regarding the appointment of an administrator, underscoring...
Court Disposition
Application for extension of orders dismissed as moot; directions issued for service and accounting.
Orders
- All respondents to be served within 30 days.
- Applicants to deposit Kshs.94,000/= and all further collected rent into the estate account.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA
AT MOMBASA
CITATION SUCCESSION CAUSE NO. 1 OF 2001
IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF : OMAR MOHAMED HATIMY SAID OMAR MOHAMED
MANTHURA OMAR MOHAMED
UMI OMAR MOHAMED …………………..……………….APPLICANTS
- VERSUS -
MUHIDDIN OMAR MOHAMED
MOHAMED OMAR MOHAMED
AHMED OMAR MOHAMED
ABDALLA OMAR MOHAMED
TWAHIR OMAR MOHAMED
HASWA OMAR MOHAMED
KHADIJA OMAR MOHAMED
TEBA OMAR MOHAMED……………….……………. RESPONDENTS
R U L I N G
The application by Notice of Motion is brought under the provisions of order 49 rules 5 of the Civil Procedure Rules and Section 47 of the Succession Act and Procedural Rules. It seeks an extension of the orders issued by this court on 23rd November, 2001 requiring that all the parties be served and matter proceed to hearing within a period of 60 days from the date of the said ruling. It is now well over that period which in effect means there are no orders to be extended. Mr. Bryant for the 3rd and 7th Respondents though opposing the application said he was aware it was to the benefit of all the parties involved and therefore any further delay should be avoided.
The 1st and 4th Respondents too concurred that it was to the interest of the estate that all heirs be served. The court had however ordered for the production of accounts to date to show how much rent had been collected and preserved for the estate. It has now transpired that the rent has been collected from December 2001 todate by the three applicants namely, Said Omar Mohamed, Mohiddin Omar Mohamed and Umi Omar Mohamedwho have opened a joint Account No.5200086009 with Diamond Trust. The Account as at the 12. 6.02 had a total of Kshs.127,000/= and the applicants conceded they had used Kshs.94,000/=. The court wishes to remind them that the money was to be collected and held by them in trust of the estate pending the appointment of an administrator of the estate. They should therefore ensure the Kshs.94,000/= is all banked in the said accounts as well as all money collected thereafter. They are further reminded to keep proper records for purposes of accounting. As the court had earlier in November, 2001 observed, this is a sensitive matter on inheritance and all parties must be given a fair chance to participate in the proceedings.In the circumstances, it is ordered that the other Respondents be served within 30 days. It is further ordered that the application by summons dated 20. 6.2001 be heard on the 17. 7.2002 if the parties will not have agreed on an Administrator to the estate. Costs of the application to the Respondents
Dated and Delivered at Mombasa this 14th day of June, 2002.
P.M. TUTUI
COMMISSIONER OF ASSIZE