[2023] KEHC 798 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was in custody throughout the trial period, as there was no evidence he was released on bond. The trial magistrate failed to consider this period when passing sentence. Applying section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court held that the ten-year sentence should be...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 798 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: David Otieno Omolo; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E008 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Sentence to run from June 7, 2017.
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Custodial Sentence, Manslaughter, Credit for Time Served
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
David Otieno Omolo
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Sentence Review Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent in custody during trial should be taken into account in computing the applicant's sentence.
- 2 Whether the trial magistrate erred by not considering the pre-sentence custodial period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was in custody throughout the trial period, as there was no evidence he was released on bond. The trial magistrate failed to consider this period when passing sentence. Applying section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the High Court held that the ten-year sentence should be computed from the date of arrest, which, in the absence of contrary evidence, was determined to be June 7, 2017. The court thus ordered that the sentence run from that date, ensuring the applicant receives credit for time already served in custody prior to sentencing.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Sentence to run from June 7, 2017.
Orders
- The sentence of ten (10) years imprisonment shall be calculated from June 7, 2017, pursuant to section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- File closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Omolo v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E008 of 2023) [2023] KEHC 798 (KLR) (9 February 2023) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 798 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E008 of 2023
RE Aburili, J
February 9, 2023
Between
David Otieno Omolo
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an application for sentence review in judgment, conviction and sentence of Hon EN Wasike, SRM in Bondo PM Cr 1124/2018 on 30. 8.2019 and in Siaya HCCRA No. 71 of 2019 Criminal Appeal 70 & 71 of 2019 )
Ruling
1. The applicant/convict David Otieno Omollo was convicted and sentenced to serve ten (10) years imprisonment to the offence of manslaughter contrary to section 202 as read with section 205 of the Penal Code vide Bondo PMCr 1124/2018. He appealed to this court vide HCCRA 71/2019 which appeal he voluntarily withdrew on November 18, 2019. He now by his application dated February 2, 2023 seeks that the period spent in custody during trial be taken into account.
2. I have perused the lower court proceedings annexed to the application. The convict was apprehended to court on November 29, 2018 when he took plea of not guilty. He was jointly charged with Erick Omollo Labilo. They were granted bond of Kshs 300,000/= plus one surety of similar amount but from the trial court proceedings, there is no evidence that he raised the bond terms for him to be released on bond. It follows that indeed, the convict was in custody during the pendency of his trial.
3. I have also perused the sentencing remarks pronounced on August 30, 2019. The trial magistrate never took into account the period spent in custody in sentencing.
4. That being the case, I find this application merited. I allow it and order that pursuant to the provisions of section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, the sentence of ten (10) years imprisonment shall be calculated from the date of arrest of the convict which is not in the charge sheet as the record shows that the convict was arrested sometime in 2017 but the date is not shown. However, as there is no contrary evidence that he was arrested on June 7, 2017 which was a day after the death of the deceased and the fact that initially the convict was charged with the offence of murder which was reduced to manslaughter, I hereby order that the sentence of ten (10) years imprisonment shall be calculated from June 7, 2017.
5. I so order.
6. File closed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED AT SIAYA THIS 9THDAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023R.E. ABURILIJUDGE