[2022] KEHC 17149 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 17149 (KLR)

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review or alter a sentence that had already been considered and upheld by a court of equal jurisdiction. The only remedy available to the applicant was to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The application for review of sentence was therefore dismissed for want of merit, as...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 17149 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Brian Omondi; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Bungoma
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E047 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
REA Ougo
Legal Topics
Defilement, Mandatory Sentencing, Sentence Review, Constitutionality of Statutes
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Defilement Mandatory Sentencing Sentence Review Constitutionality of Statutes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Brian Omondi

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the mandatory minimum sentence under section 8(3) of the Sexual Offences Act is unconstitutional.
  2. 2 Whether the period spent in custody should be considered in sentencing under section 333(2) of the Penal Code.
  3. 3 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review a sentence already upheld by a court of equal jurisdiction.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that it lacked jurisdiction to review or alter a sentence that had already been considered and upheld by a court of equal jurisdiction. The only remedy available to the applicant was to appeal to the Court of Appeal. The application for review of sentence was therefore dismissed for want of merit, as the High Court cannot sit on appeal over its own decision or that of another High Court judge.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application for review of sentence is dismissed.