[2025] KECPT 351 (KLR)
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided sufficient documentary evidence, including a Statement of Account, to prove her entitlement to a refund of Kshs. 733,000 in deposits. The Respondent did not provide any credible evidence to dispute the Claimant's account or demonstrate any liabilities owed by the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KECPT 351 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Winfred Omwaka; Respondent: Cosmos Sacco Society Ltd
- Court
- Cooperative Tribunal
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Tribunal Case 194.E264 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- judgment for the claimant
- Judges
- Janet Mwatsama, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw, PO Aol
- Legal Topics
- Sacco Member Refunds, Deposit Recovery, Member Withdrawal Rights
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Winfred Omwaka
Applicant
Cosmos Sacco Society Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Claimant is entitled to a refund of her deposits from the Respondent Sacco upon withdrawal as a member.
- 2 Whether the Respondent's financial challenges or alleged mismanagement by previous officials can lawfully justify withholding the Claimant's refund.
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal found that the Claimant had provided sufficient documentary evidence, including a Statement of Account, to prove her entitlement to a refund of Kshs. 733,000 in deposits. The Respondent did not provide any credible evidence to dispute the Claimant's account or demonstrate any liabilities owed by the Claimant. The Tribunal rejected the Respondent's argument that financial difficulties or prior mismanagement could justify withholding the refund, holding that such internal issues are not the responsibility of the member. Since the Sacco remains a going concern and is not under liquidation, it is obligated to refund the Claimant her deposits, less the share capital component....
Court Disposition
judgment for the claimant
Orders
- The Respondent shall pay the Claimant Kshs. 718,000 being refund of deposits less share capital.
- The Respondent shall pay costs of the suit to the Claimant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Omwaka v Cosmos Sacco Society Ltd (Tribunal Case 194. E264 of 2023) [2025] KECPT 351 (KLR) (Civ) (26 June 2025) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2025] KECPT 351 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Cooperative Tribunal
Civil
Tribunal Case 194. E264 of 2023
Janet Mwatsama, Vice Chair, B Sawe, F Lotuiya, P. Gichuki, M Chesikaw & PO Aol, Members
June 26, 2025
Between
Winfred Omwaka
Claimant
and
Cosmos Sacco Society Ltd
Respondent
Judgment
1. Matter for determination is Statement of Claim dated 31/3/2023 filed on even date.Claimant states she was a member of the Respondent Sacco until 3/2/2020 when she wrote a withdrawal letter to get back her refunds. As at the time of withdrawal she claims to have had deposits of Kshs. 733,000/=. Her prayers in the Statement of Claim are:a.The said sum of Kshs. 733,000/=b.Costs of the suit and interest until payment in full.c.Any other relief so deemed appropriate by this Honourable Tribunal.Claimant filled List of Documents dated 31/3/2025 which contained:a.Withdrawalb.Statement
2. Respondent filled statement of Defence dated 12. 12. 2023. The Respondent denied the Claim by the Claimant and states Claimant needs to prove the claim. Further the Respondent avers there was miss management by previous officials and there is need for a forensic audit to be done. It would be unfair to refund the Claimant using the deposits of current members.
3. Matter being one of refund the Tribunal directs that parties to file and serve written submissions to canvas the claim Claimants filled their written submissions dated 24/1/2025 .Respondent filled their written submissions dated 12/3/2025. Having considered the Claim and documents in support and the Respondent Defence as well as the parties documents the issue for determination is whether the Claimant is entitled to her refund of Kshs. 733,000/=.Claimant to prove her claim filled her Statement of Account for Respondent society when it showed she had deposits of Kshs. 733,000/=.In the said Statement of Account, it does not show Claimant having any liabilities. Respondent on the other hand did not contrast the Claimants documents more so the Statement of Account.
4. The Respondent Sacco having financial challenges is not a reason why they should not refund the Claimant their deposits. The mismanagement as well is not business of the Claimant as a member but officials need to take their officials for investigation and maybe later surcharge would follow.The society still being a going concern and not in Liquidation has no reasons why refunds should not be done without deliberating the matter at hand Claimant has filed her documents to support her claim and this Tribunal is convinced of the same that Respondent owe her as much.
Upshot 5. Judgment is entered in favor of Claimant against Respondent for Kshs. 718,000/= less Kshs.15,000/= Share Capital plus costs and interest.
JUDGMENT SIGNED, DATED AND DELIVERED VIRTUALLY AT NAIROBI THIS 26TH DAY OF JUNE ,2025. HON. J. MWATSAMA DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 26. 6.2025Hon. Beatrice Sawe Member Signed 26. 6.2025Hon. Fridah Lotuiya Member Signed 26. 6.2025Hon. Philip Gichuki Member Signed 26. 6.2025Hon. Michael Chesikaw Member Signed 26. 6.2025Hon. Paul Aol Member Signed 26. 6.2025Tribunal Clerk A. GechikoWinfred Omwaka presentWanjiru Mwende Advocate – None AppearanceHON. J. MWATSAMA – DEPUTY CHAIRPERSON SIGNED 26. 6.2025