Omwenga t/a Omwenga & Co. Advocates v Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd (Miscellaneous Case E076 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 13264 (KLR) (30 July 2026) (Ruling)

Omwenga t/a Omwenga & Co. Advocates v Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd (Miscellaneous Case E076 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 13264 (KLR) (30 July 2026) (Ruling)

The application was incompetent because the three Advocate-Client Bills of Costs had been taxed in separate miscellaneous applications and each produced a distinct Certificate of Costs; therefore, judgment could not properly be sought by one consolidated motion across the three files, and separate applications had...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 13264 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Duke O. Omwenga T/A Omwenga & Co. Advocates; Respondent: Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Case E076 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Advocate Client Costs / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act
Outcome
Notice of Motion struck out
Judges
["TW Cherere"]
Legal Topics
Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs, Advocate Client Bill of Costs, Consolidation of Miscellaneous Applications, Certificate of Costs, Competence of Application
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocates Law Costs Entry of Judgment on Taxed Costs Advocate Client Bill of Costs Consolidation of Miscellaneous Applications Certificate of Costs Competence of Application

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Duke O. Omwenga T/A Omwenga & Co. Advocates

Applicant

Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Advocate Client Costs / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Entry of Judgment Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act

  1. 1 Whether judgment could be entered under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act on aggregate Certificates of Costs arising from three separate miscellaneous files
  2. 2 Whether the Applicant could properly seek consolidation of HCCCMISC E076, E078 and E083 of 2025 for purposes of judgment

Ratio Decidendi

The application was incompetent because the three Advocate-Client Bills of Costs had been taxed in separate miscellaneous applications and each produced a distinct Certificate of Costs; therefore, judgment could not properly be sought by one consolidated motion across the three files, and separate applications had to be filed in each matter.

Court Disposition

Notice of Motion struck out

Orders

  • The Notice of Motion dated 18th June 2026 is struck out.
  • The Applicant is at liberty to file separate applications under section 51(2) of the Advocates Act in HCCCMISC E076, HCCCMISC E078 and HCCCMISC E083 of 2025 respectively.