Omwenga t/a Omwenga & Company Advocates v Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd (Miscellaneous Case E063 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 13263 (KLR) (20 July 2026) (Ruling)

Omwenga t/a Omwenga & Company Advocates v Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd (Miscellaneous Case E063 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 13263 (KLR) (20 July 2026) (Ruling)

The court entered judgment for the advocate because the advocate-client bill had been taxed at KES 100,172, a certificate of costs had issued, and no reference had been filed against the taxation; the respondent did not oppose the application, so the court granted judgment, interest, and a 30-day stay of execution.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KEHC 13263 (KLR)
Parties
Advocate/applicant: Duke O. Omwenga t/a Omwenga & Company Advocates; Client/respondent: Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd
Court
High Court
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Case E063 of 2025
Procedural Posture
Advocate Client Taxation Matter / Ruling on Application for Judgment After Taxation
Outcome
Application allowed; judgment entered for the Applicant with interest and a limited stay of execution.
Judges
["TW Cherere"]
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Bill of Costs, Taxation of Costs, Judgment on Taxed Costs, Interest on Costs, Stay of Execution
Source Language
en
Advocacy and Legal Fees Civil Procedure Advocate Client Bill of Costs Taxation of Costs Judgment on Taxed Costs Interest on Costs Stay of Execution

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Duke O. Omwenga t/a Omwenga & Company Advocates

Advocate/applicant

Kenya Orient Insurance Co. Ltd

Client/respondent

Procedural Posture

Advocate Client Taxation Matter / Ruling on Application for Judgment After Taxation

  1. 1 Whether judgment should be entered for the advocate for the taxed amount in the absence of a reference against taxation.
  2. 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum was payable on the taxed sum from 20th April 2026.
  3. 3 Whether execution should be stayed for 30 days to allow settlement.

Ratio Decidendi

The court entered judgment for the advocate because the advocate-client bill had been taxed at KES 100,172, a certificate of costs had issued, and no reference had been filed against the taxation; the respondent did not oppose the application, so the court granted judgment, interest, and a 30-day stay of execution.

Court Disposition

Application allowed; judgment entered for the Applicant with interest and a limited stay of execution.

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the Applicant against the Respondent in the sum of Kshs. 100,172.
  • Interest awarded at 14% per annum from 20th April 2026 until payment in full.