[2023] KEHC 3157 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant was arrested on May 19, 2016, and there was no evidence that he was released on bond prior to sentencing. Both the trial court and the appellate court failed to consider the period spent in custody as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court held that...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2023] KEHC 3157 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Patrick Maranda Ondieki; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application E084 of 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- RE Aburili
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing Procedure, Credit for Time Served, Sexual Offences, Appeal Dismissal
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Patrick Maranda Ondieki
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the period spent in custody prior to sentencing should be considered in computing the applicant's sentence as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
- 2 Whether the trial and appellate courts erred by failing to account for the applicant's pre-sentence custody period.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant was arrested on May 19, 2016, and there was no evidence that he was released on bond prior to sentencing. Both the trial court and the appellate court failed to consider the period spent in custody as required by Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court held that the applicant's sentence of twenty years' imprisonment should be computed from the date of his arrest, May 19, 2016, thereby crediting him for the time already spent in custody. The application was therefore merited and allowed.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The twenty (20) years imprisonment imposed on the convict on April 6, 2017 shall be calculated from May 19, 2016, the date of arrest.
- Prison authorities to be served with this order forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
25 paragraphs
Ondieki v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E084 of 2022) [2023] KEHC 3157 (KLR) (12 April 2023) (Judgment)
Neutral citation: [2023] KEHC 3157 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E084 of 2022
RE Aburili, J
April 12, 2023
Between
Patrick Maranda Ondieki
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Kisumu HCRA No 27 of 2017 which appeal was dismissed on May 10, 2018 Criminal Appeal 27 of 2017 )
Judgment
1. The Applicant Patrick Maranda Ondieki vide his application filed on August 5, 2022 claims that he was convicted and sentenced to serve twenty (20) years imprisonment for the offence of defilement contrary to Section 8(1) as read with Section 8(2) of the Sexual Offences Act on April 6, 2019.
2. He claims that the court in sentencing him did not take into account the period that he spent in custody as part of the sentence served as per the provisions of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Codeand in line with Article 25(2) of the Constitution. He claims that he was in prison for one (1) year prior to being sentenced by the Maseno Principal Magistrate’s Court Sexual Offences Case No. 633 of 2016.
3. He also claims that he appealed vide Kisumu HCRA No 27 of 2017 which appeal was dismissed on May 10, 2018 where the court upheld the conviction and sentence.
4. I have considered the application and perused the original lower court file Maseno Principal Magistrate Sexual Offences Case No 633 of 2016 and original HCRA No 27 of 2017 and the proceedings and judgment in the two files.
5. The convict herein was according to the charge sheet dated May 23, 2016, arrested on May 19, 2016. He took plea on May 23, 2016.
6. On the date when he took plea, the court granted him bond of Kshs 200,000/= plus one surety of similar amount. However, there is no evidence that the Convict herein was released on the bond as granted. It follows that he remained in custody until he was sentenced and in sentencing, the trial court and the High Court on appeal did not take into account the period spent in custody as contemplated in Section 33(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code.
7. For the above reasons, I find this application merited. I allow it and order that the twenty (20) years imprisonment imposed on the convict herein on April 6, 2017 shall be calculated from May 19, 2016 the date of arrest of the Convict Patrick Maranda Ondieki.
8. Prison to be served with this order forthwith.
9. This file is hereby closed. I so order.
Dated, Signed and Delivered at Kisumu this 12thDay of April, 2023R E ABURILIJUDGE