https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kecopt/2026/240

https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kecopt/2026/240

The Tribunal held that the requested amendment merely corrected a misdescription of the 1st Respondent’s name, the error appeared genuine, there was no objection from the Respondents, and the amendment would not mislead or create doubt as to identity. Accordingly, the application satisfied the requirements of Order...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2026] KECOPT 240 (KLR)
Parties
1st Claimant: Daniel Achoki Onduso; 2nd Claimant: Alfred Mokongu Nyambati; 1st Respondent: Josiah Oyaro; 2nd Respondent: Nyamobite Farmers Co-op Society Limited
Court
Cooperative Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E787 of 2024
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim Before the Cooperative Tribunal / Ruling on an Unopposed Application for Leave to Amend the Statement of Claim
Outcome
Application allowed
Judges
["J Mwatsama", "B Sawe", "F Lotuiya", "PO Aol", "M Chesikaw"]
Legal Topics
Amendment of Pleadings, Misdescription of Party Name, Leave of Court, Costs in the Cause
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Co Operative Law Amendment of Pleadings Misdescription of Party Name Leave of Court Costs in the Cause

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Achoki Onduso

1st Claimant

Alfred Mokongu Nyambati

2nd Claimant

Josiah Oyaro

1st Respondent

Nyamobite Farmers Co-op Society Limited

2nd Respondent

Procedural Posture

Civil Claim Before the Cooperative Tribunal / Ruling on an Unopposed Application for Leave to Amend the Statement of Claim

  1. 1 Whether the Claimants should be granted leave to amend their statement of claim and related pleadings to correct the name of the 1st Respondent
  2. 2 Whether the error in naming the 1st Respondent as Joash Oyaro instead of Josiah Oyaro was genuine and non-prejudicial

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal held that the requested amendment merely corrected a misdescription of the 1st Respondent’s name, the error appeared genuine, there was no objection from the Respondents, and the amendment would not mislead or create doubt as to identity. Accordingly, the application satisfied the requirements of Order 8 and leave to amend was granted.

Court Disposition

Application allowed

Orders

  • Leave granted to the Claimants to amend their statement of claim to change the 1st Respondent’s name from Joash Oyaro to Josiah Oyaro.
  • The Claimants shall file and serve the Amended Statement of Claim within seven (7) days from the date of the ruling.