[2022] KEPPDT 1060 (KLR)

[2022] KEPPDT 1060 (KLR)

The Tribunal found that the applicant had provided sufficient documentary evidence, including the consensus agreement, proof of payment of nomination fees, and the complaint to the party's internal dispute resolution mechanism. The respondents failed to appear or contest the applicant's case, leaving the applicant's...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEPPDT 1060 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Kennedy Onduso; Respondent: Jubilee Political Party; Respondent: Dennis Mauti
Court
Political Parties Disputes Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Tribunal Case E015 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Tribunal Complaint / Judgment
Outcome
complaint allowed
Judges
W Mutubwa, F Saman, S Walubengo
Legal Topics
Party Nominations, Internal Dispute Resolution, Nomination Certificates
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Administrative Law Party Nominations Internal Dispute Resolution Nomination Certificates

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Kennedy Onduso

Applicant

Jubilee Political Party

Respondent

Dennis Mauti

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Tribunal Complaint / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the 1st Respondent acted contrary to the consensus agreement by issuing the nomination certificate to the 2nd Respondent.
  2. 2 Whether the Complainant is entitled to be declared the valid nominee for Member of County Assembly for Majoge Bassi Ward.
  3. 3 Whether the Nomination Certificate issued to the 2nd Respondent is null and void.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal found that the applicant had provided sufficient documentary evidence, including the consensus agreement, proof of payment of nomination fees, and the complaint to the party's internal dispute resolution mechanism. The respondents failed to appear or contest the applicant's case, leaving the applicant's evidence unchallenged. The Tribunal held that the 1st Respondent acted contrary to the consensus agreement by issuing the nomination certificate to the 2nd Respondent. The Tribunal declared the applicant as the valid nominee for the 1st Respondent's ticket for Member of County Assembly for Majoge Bassi Ward, nullified the certificate issued to the 2nd Respondent, and directed...

Court Disposition

complaint allowed

Orders

  • Declaration that the Complainant is the valid nominee for the 1st Respondent’s ticket for Member of County Assembly for Majoge Bassi Ward.
  • Declaration that the Nomination Certificate issued to the 2nd Respondent by the 1st Respondent is null and void.