[2021] KEHC 12735 (KLR)

[2021] KEHC 12735 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had properly served the respondent with the hearing notice and that the respondent failed to oppose the application or settle the certificate of taxation. The court was satisfied that the application was merited, as the applicant had established its entitlement to the taxed costs,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEHC 12735 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Ong’anda & Associates Advocates; Respondent: Trident Insurance Company Limited
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Application E926 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Certificate of Taxation
Outcome
application allowed as prayed
Judges
WA Okwany
Legal Topics
Advocate Client Costs, Certificate of Taxation, Judgment Entry, Enforcement of Decree
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Commercial and Corporate Advocate Client Costs Certificate of Taxation Judgment Entry Enforcement of Decree

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ong’anda & Associates Advocates

Applicant

Trident Insurance Company Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Certificate of Taxation

  1. 1 Whether the court should enter judgment in favour of the applicant for the amount stated in the certificate of taxation.
  2. 2 Whether the respondent was properly served and failed to oppose the application.
  3. 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to costs of the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had properly served the respondent with the hearing notice and that the respondent failed to oppose the application or settle the certificate of taxation. The court was satisfied that the application was merited, as the applicant had established its entitlement to the taxed costs, and there was no evidence to the contrary. Accordingly, judgment was entered for the applicant for the amount stated in the certificate of taxation, and a decree was to issue for enforcement. The respondent was also ordered to bear the costs of the application.

Court Disposition

application allowed as prayed

Orders

  • Judgment entered for the applicant for Kshs 774,852.51 in terms of the certificate of taxation dated 27th November 2020.
  • A decree to issue for enforcement/execution.