[2022] KECA 749 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant's reasons for delay were plausible, particularly given the inhibitions faced by an incarcerated person whose ability to pursue legal redress is severely curtailed. The court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, determining that it was fair and just to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2022] KECA 749 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Alfred Bogongo Ongera; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- Court of Appeal
- Court Station
- Court of Appeal at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Application E001 of 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
- Outcome
- application allowed
- Judges
- PO Kiage
- Legal Topics
- Extension of Time, Appeals Process, Incarceration and Access to Counsel
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alfred Bogongo Ongera
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Application / Application for Extension of Time to File Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to file an appeal out of time against the High Court judgment.
- 2 Whether the notice of appeal already lodged should be deemed as duly filed.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant's reasons for delay were plausible, particularly given the inhibitions faced by an incarcerated person whose ability to pursue legal redress is severely curtailed. The court exercised its discretion under Rule 4 of the Court of Appeal Rules, determining that it was fair and just to grant the extension of time sought. The notice of appeal already lodged was deemed as duly filed, allowing the applicant to proceed with his appeal out of time.
Court Disposition
application allowed
Orders
- The application for extension of time is allowed.
- The notice of appeal is deemed as duly filed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Ongera v Republic (Criminal Application E001 of 2020) [2022] KECA 749 (KLR) (27 May 2022) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2022] KECA 749 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the Court of Appeal at Kisumu
Criminal Application E001 of 2020
PO Kiage, J
May 27, 2022
Between
Alfred Bogongo Ongera
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Application from a judgment of the High Court of Kenya at Nyamira (E. N. Maina, J.) delivered on 29th March, 2019 in HCCRA No. 42 of 2016 Criminal Appeal 42 of 2016 )
Ruling
1. The applicant, Alfred Bogongo Ongera, who is serving a term of life in prison upon conviction under section 8(1) as read with 8(c) of the Sexual Offnces Act, prays for leave to file an appeal out of time against the judgment of the High Court of Kenya (E. N. Maina, J.) by which his first appeal was dismissed on 29th March, 2019. He prays further that the notice of appeal already lodged be deemed as duly filed.
2. On the face of the motion and in the supporting affidavit and submissions filed by his learned advocates Ms. Bruce Odeny & Company Advocates, the applicant indicates that following his sentence he was incarcerated and lost contact with his relatives who had promised to instruct an advocate but failed to do so. He finally was put in touch with his current counsel but by then time under the Rules for filing the notice of appeal had elapsed. He states that the delay was not deliberate.
3. The respondent by written submissions dated 19th July, 2021 under the hand of learned Prosecution Counsel Ligami Shitsama, is not averse to the grant of the application and urges that the applicant he be accorded the benefit of doubt.
4. I have considered the application. it is erroneously indicated as brought under Rule 62 of the Court of Appeal Rules but I will deal with it under Rule 4 which is the applicable rule donating to me jurisdiction to extend time at my free and unfettered discretion. I think that the reasons proffered are plausible and, give the inhibitions faced by the applicant as a man under incarceration with ability to freely pursue legal redress severely curtailed, it is only fair and just that I should grant the time extension sought.
5. In the result, the application is allowed and the notice of appeal be and is hereby deemed as duly filed.
DATED AND DELIVERED AT KISUMU THIS 27TH DAY OF MAY, 2022P. O. KIAGE.............................JUDGE OF APPEALI certify that this is a true copy of the original.SignedDEPUTY REGISTRAR