[2023] KEELC 22596 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 22596 (KLR)

The court declined to grant the injunctive orders sought at this stage, primarily due to concerns regarding the possible application of the doctrine of res judicata, given the existence of Kisii ELC Case No 754 of 2016 involving similar parties and subject matter. The court noted the plaintiffs' failure to disclose...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 22596 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Daniel Paul Onkangi; Plaintiff: Wilfred K Babu; Defendant: James Mangaa Mikubo; Defendant: Orina Mayenga
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Case Civil Suit E003 of 2023
Procedural Posture
Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application (injunction) Directions Issued
Outcome
Application not determined on merits; directions issued for service and further filings.
Judges
JM Kamau
Legal Topics
Injunctive Relief, Boundary Disputes, Res Judicata, Disclosure of Material Facts
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Injunctive Relief Boundary Disputes Res Judicata Disclosure of Material Facts

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Daniel Paul Onkangi

Plaintiff

Wilfred K Babu

Plaintiff

James Mangaa Mikubo

Defendant

Orina Mayenga

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Suit / Interlocutory Application (injunction) Directions Issued

  1. 1 Whether the plaintiffs are entitled to interlocutory injunctive orders restraining the defendants from trespassing, cutting trees, or interfering with the common boundary pending hearing and determination of the suit.
  2. 2 Whether the doctrine of res judicata applies given the existence of Kisii ELC Case No 754 of 2016 involving similar parties and subject matter.
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiffs have made full and candid disclosure of all material facts relevant to the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to grant the injunctive orders sought at this stage, primarily due to concerns regarding the possible application of the doctrine of res judicata, given the existence of Kisii ELC Case No 754 of 2016 involving similar parties and subject matter. The court noted the plaintiffs' failure to disclose the full status and outcome of the previous suit, which is material to the determination of the present application. The court emphasized the necessity for parties to be candid and to disclose all relevant facts when seeking equitable relief. Consequently, the court ordered the plaintiffs to serve the application on the defendants, who are to respond within 7 days, and directed...

Court Disposition

Application not determined on merits; directions issued for service and further filings.

Orders

  • Applicants to serve the application dated March 24, 2023 upon the defendants within 7 days.
  • Defendants to file and serve their responses within 7 days of service.