[2025] KEHC 10499 (KLR)
The court found that the dispute centered on ownership and title to land, specifically Land Parcel Reference Number Manga Settlement Scheme/277 and its subdivisions. The Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act expressly reserve such matters for the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court. The High Court, by virtue of Article 165(5) of the Constitution, is precluded from hearing and determining disputes falling within the jurisdiction of courts established under Article 162(2), including the Environment and Land Court. The court emphasized that jurisdiction is foundational and cannot be assumed or conferred by the parties or the court itself. As the applicant's...
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 10499 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Christopher Matara Onsongo; Respondent: Zacharia Onsongo; Respondent: Mary Mochumbe; Respondent: Ministry of Lands; Respondent: Land registrar, Nyamira County; Respondent: Attorney General; Respondent: Estate of the Late Jerush Nyatichi; Respondent: Settlement Fund Trustees
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nyamira
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Judgment Date
- 3 July 2025
- Case Number
- Petition E010 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
- Outcome
- Petition and application struck out for want of jurisdiction; preliminary objection upheld.
- Judges
- WA Okwany
- Legal Topics
- Jurisdiction of Courts, Environment and Land Court Mandate, Land Ownership Disputes, Preliminary Objection, Injunctive Relief
- Source Language
- English
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Christopher Matara Onsongo
Applicant
Zacharia Onsongo
Respondent
Mary Mochumbe
Respondent
Ministry of Lands
Respondent
Land registrar, Nyamira County
Respondent
Attorney General
Respondent
Estate of the Late Jerush Nyatichi
Respondent
Settlement Fund Trustees
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Constitutional Petition / Ruling on Preliminary Objection
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to hear and determine disputes relating to ownership and title to land in light of Article 162(2)(b) of the Constitution.
- 2 Whether the Preliminary Objection challenging jurisdiction is merited.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the dispute centered on ownership and title to land, specifically Land Parcel Reference Number Manga Settlement Scheme/277 and its subdivisions. The Constitution and the Environment and Land Court Act expressly reserve such matters for the exclusive jurisdiction of the Environment and Land Court. The High Court, by virtue of Article 165(5) of the Constitution, is precluded from hearing and determining disputes falling within the jurisdiction of courts established under Article 162(2), including the Environment and Land Court. The court emphasized that jurisdiction is foundational and cannot be assumed or conferred by the parties or the court itself. As the applicant's...
Court Disposition
Petition and application struck out for want of jurisdiction; preliminary objection upheld.
Orders
- The preliminary objection is upheld.
- The petition and application are struck out for want of jurisdiction.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment