[2025] KEHC 360 (KLR)
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated it was instructed by the respondent, rendered professional services, and the costs were taxed by the Taxing Master at Ksh.122,113/-. The respondent did not oppose the application or challenge the certificate of taxation. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act,...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] KEHC 360 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Onyango, Jonyo & Company Advocates; Respondent: Faith Akinyi Juma
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Kisumu
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Application E267 of 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
- Outcome
- Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for Ksh.122,113/- plus interest at 14% per annum from 6th November, 2024 until payment in full. No order as to costs for the application.
- Judges
- JM Omido
- Legal Topics
- Taxation of Costs, Advocate Client Fees, Certificate of Taxation, Interest on Costs
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Onyango, Jonyo & Company Advocates
Applicant
Faith Akinyi Juma
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Judgment on Taxed Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Certificate of Taxation of Costs should be adopted as the judgment and decree of the court.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to interest on the taxed costs at 14% per annum from the date of taxation until payment in full.
- 3 Whether the respondent should bear the costs of the application.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the applicant had demonstrated it was instructed by the respondent, rendered professional services, and the costs were taxed by the Taxing Master at Ksh.122,113/-. The respondent did not oppose the application or challenge the certificate of taxation. Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act, the certificate of taxation is sufficient for entry of judgment unless set aside. The applicant was therefore entitled to judgment for the taxed sum and interest at 14% per annum from the date of taxation until payment in full. As the application was unopposed, the court made no order as to costs for the application itself.
Court Disposition
Application allowed. Judgment entered for the applicant for Ksh.122,113/- plus interest at 14% per annum from 6th November, 2024 until payment in full. No order as to costs for the application.
Orders
- Judgment is entered in favour of the applicant against the respondent for Ksh.122,113/- as per the Certificate of Taxation of Costs dated 6th November, 2024.
- The sum of Ksh.122,113/- shall attract interest at 14% per annum from 6th November, 2024 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
21 paragraphs
Onyango, Jonyo & Company Advocates v Juma (Miscellaneous Application E267 of 2024) [2025] KEHC 360 (KLR) (22 January 2025) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2025] KEHC 360 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Kisumu
Miscellaneous Application E267 of 2024
JM Omido, J
January 22, 2025
Between
Onyango, Jonyo & Company Advocates
Applicant
and
Faith Akinyi Juma
Respondent
Ruling
1. This ruling results from the Advocate/Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 15th November, 2024, brought Section 51 of the Advocates Act, Cap 16 Laws of Kenya and seeks the following orders:a.That the Certificate of Costs dated 6th November, 2024, in respect of the order made on 6th November, 2024 for the sum of Ksh.122,113/- be adopted as the judgement and decree of this Honourable Court.b.That the Applicant be awarded interest accrued on the costs at 14% per annum from 6th November, 2024 until payment in full.c.That the costs of this application be borne by the Client/Respondent.
2. The grounds upon which the application is premised are in precis that the Respondent instructed the Appellant to act for it in Kisumu Children’s Court Case No. E033 of 2023 and that the Applicant professionally executed the Respondents instructions. The Respondent subsequently failed to settle the Applicant’s legal fees which then resulted in the Applicant filing its bill of costs that was subsequently taxed by the Taxing Master at Ksh.122,113/- and a Certificate of Taxation of Costs issued to that effect on 6th November, 2024. The costs remain unsettled.
3. The application is supported by the affidavit of Oscar Onyango, Advocate, the proprietor of the Applicant law firm sworn on 15th November, 2024. The affidavit, to which is annexed inter alia the Certificate of Taxation of Costs, expounds on the above grounds.
4. Service of the application and the hearing notice thereof was effected upon the Respondent to the satisfaction of this court. The Respondent did not respond to the Motion and the application thus proceeded as unopposed.
5. Having perused the application, the affidavit in support thereof and the record in its entirety, I am satisfied that the Applicant has demonstrated that it was instructed by and represented the Respondent in the above matter and that the Applicant’s costs as determined by the Taxing Master remain unsettled.
6. Having said as much, the application has merit and I will proceed to allow it in the following terms:a.That judgement is hereby entered in favour of the Applicant against the Respondent for the sum of Ksh.122,113/- as per the Certificate of Taxation of Costs issued herein dated 6th November, 2024. b.That the above sum of Ksh.122,113/- shall attract interest at the rate of 14% per annum from 6th November, 2024 until payment in full.c.That as the Notice of Motion dated 15th November, 2024 was not opposed, I make no orders as to costs in respect thereof.
DELIVERED (VIRTUALLY), DATED AND SIGNED THIS 22ND DAY OF JANUARY, 2025. JOE M. OMIDOJUDGEFor the Applicant: Mr. Jonyo.For the Repondent: No appearance.Court Assistant: Mr. Ngoge & Mr. Juma.