[2021] KEELC 582 (KLR)

[2021] KEELC 582 (KLR)

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause for the grant of stay of execution pending appeal. The parties had agreed that the deposit of the title deed for the suit land, Kasigunga/Kemreri/756, with the court would serve as adequate security. The court was guided by the principles set out...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2021] KEELC 582 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Onyango Oriri; Applicant: Agnes Atieno Oriri & Another; Respondent: Benard Onyango Ojwang; Respondent: Daniel Onyango Otieno
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment and Land Appeal E009 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Stay Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal
Outcome
Notice of Motion allowed; stay of execution granted on condition of deposit of title deed; costs in the appeal.
Legal Topics
Stay of Execution, Security for Appeal, Preservation Orders
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Stay of Execution Security for Appeal Preservation Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Onyango Oriri

Applicant

Agnes Atieno Oriri & Another

Applicant

Benard Onyango Ojwang

Respondent

Daniel Onyango Otieno

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Stay Application / Ruling on Notice of Motion for Stay Pending Appeal

  1. 1 Whether the applicants are entitled to an order for stay of execution of the judgment of the trial court pending appeal.
  2. 2 Whether the deposit of the title deed as security is sufficient for the grant of stay.
  3. 3 Whether the application for stay meets the legal threshold under the law.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicants had demonstrated sufficient cause for the grant of stay of execution pending appeal. The parties had agreed that the deposit of the title deed for the suit land, Kasigunga/Kemreri/756, with the court would serve as adequate security. The court was guided by the principles set out in Article 159 of the Constitution, the Environment and Land Court Act, and the decision in Butt v Rent Restriction Tribunal, emphasizing the need to preserve the subject matter of the appeal and ensure that the appeal is not rendered nugatory. The court therefore granted the stay of execution on condition that the title deed be deposited forthwith, and directed that costs of...

Court Disposition

Notice of Motion allowed; stay of execution granted on condition of deposit of title deed; costs in the appeal.

Orders

  • Applicants to deposit the title deed for Kasigunga/Kemreri/756 with the court forthwith as security for stay of execution.
  • Costs of the Notice of Motion to be costs in the appeal.