[2022] KEHC 12812 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 12812 (KLR)

The court held that since the applicant had already served the thirty-day imprisonment term imposed in default of payment of the fine, the request for sentence review was overtaken by events and therefore declined. The matter was considered moot as there was no longer any sentence to review or alter.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 12812 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Moreline Makline Onyango; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E036 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review
Outcome
Application for sentence review declined as moot; file closed.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Review, Plea of Guilty, Possession of Alcoholic Drinks
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Review Plea of Guilty Possession of Alcoholic Drinks

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moreline Makline Onyango

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Review

  1. 1 Whether the application for sentence review is tenable after the applicant has already served the sentence imposed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that since the applicant had already served the thirty-day imprisonment term imposed in default of payment of the fine, the request for sentence review was overtaken by events and therefore declined. The matter was considered moot as there was no longer any sentence to review or alter.

Court Disposition

Application for sentence review declined as moot; file closed.

Orders

  • The request for sentence review is declined as overtaken by events.
  • This file is closed.