[2024] KEHC 4649 (KLR)
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to revise or review a sentence imposed by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction. The revisionary powers under Article 165 of the Constitution and Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code are expressly limited to orders from subordinate courts and tribunals. Entertaining such an...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 4649 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Julius Omondi Onyango; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application 127 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Sentence Review Application
- Outcome
- Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
- Judges
- DO Ogembo
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Revision, Jurisdiction of High Court, Manslaughter, Powers of Revision
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Omondi Onyango
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Miscellaneous Application / Sentence Review Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to revise a sentence imposed by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction.
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to sentence revision under the Criminal Procedure Code.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court lacks jurisdiction to revise or review a sentence imposed by a judge of concurrent jurisdiction. The revisionary powers under Article 165 of the Constitution and Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code are expressly limited to orders from subordinate courts and tribunals. Entertaining such an application would amount to the court sitting on appeal over its own decision, which is both unconstitutional and illegal. The applicant's only lawful recourse is to file an appeal against the sentence, not to seek revision before the same level of court.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.
Orders
- The application for sentence revision is dismissed wholly.
- Court file closed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
23 paragraphs
Onyango v Republic (Criminal Miscellaneous Application 127 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 4649 (KLR) (29 April 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 4649 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Criminal Miscellaneous Application 127 of 2023
DO Ogembo, J
April 29, 2024
Between
Julius Omondi Onyango
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an Application for Sentence Review from Sentence in the High Court at Siaya in Criminal Case No. 30 of 2017 delivered on 22/7/2019 by Hon. Justice R.E. Aburili - Judge)
Ruling
1. Julius Omondi Onyango, the Applicant has filed a Notice of Motion Application herein on 4/8/2023. In the Application, the Applicant seeks revision of his sentence. In the Affidavit in support of the Application, the Applicant depones that he faced a charge of Manslaughter contrary to Section 202 of the Penal Code and was sentenced by the Hon. Aburili Judge to serve 15 years imprisonment.
2. The prosecution has opposed this application on grounds that the High Court already dealt with this case and the Applicant can only file an appeal against the decision of the court.
3. I have considered this application and the response from the prosecution’s side.
4. I have also considered the submissions the Applicant has filed herein. The said submissions are basically factors of mitigation raised by the Applicant. That he is law abiding and has learnt the ills of crime and reformed that he is remorseful.
5. This application brings up the issue of whether this court is seized of the jurisdiction to entertain it in the first place. I have perused the relevant records of the trial court. Same show that Applicant was first charged with the offence of murder contrary to Section 203 as read with Section 204 of the Penal Code. The Honourable Judge proceeded to find the Applicant guilty of the lesser offence of manslaughter contrary to Section 202 as read with Section 205 of the Penal Code and sentenced him to serve 15 years imprisonment, the sentence to run from his date of arrest on 22/1/2017. This is the sentence the Applicant seeks to be revised by way of this application.
6. Article 165 of the Constitution of Kenya spells out the jurisdiction of the High Court. Similarly, Section 362 of the Criminal Procedure Code also provides for revisionary powers of the High Court. In both instances, the powers of revision bestowed on the High Court is limited to orders of subordinate courts and tribunals. This court therefore does not possess any jurisdiction to revise any order or findings made by a Judge of concurrent jurisdiction. This would be tantamount to this court sitting on appeal on its own decision. This would be unconstitutional as well as illegal. The orders sought by the Applicant can therefore not issue.
7. I therefore find this application of the Applicant filed herein on 4/8/2023 lacking in any merit. I dismiss the same wholly.
Dated, Signed and Delivered this 29th Day of April, 2024. D. O. OGEMBOJUDGE29/4/2024CourtRuling read out in Open Court in presence of the Applicant and Ms. Mumu for the State.D. O. OGEMBOJUDGE29/4/2024CourtFile closed.D. O. OGEMBOJUDGE29/4/2024SIAYA HC CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION NO. 127 OF 2023 RULING 2 | Page