https://new.kenyalaw.org/akn/ke/judgment/kehc/2026/7902
The application was unopposed, the respondent had been duly served, and no challenge was raised against the certificate of costs. The court therefore allowed the application in full, entered judgment for the certified amount, awarded interest at 14% per annum from 8/8/2025, and granted the applicant costs of the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] KEHC 7902 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Onyinkwa & D. Onyinkwa t/a Onyinkwa & Co; Respondent: Monarch Insurance Company Ltd
- Court
- High Court
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Civil Miscellaneous E155 of 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Advocates' Remuneration / Certificate of Costs Adoption as Judgment / Ruling on Unopposed Application
- Outcome
- Application allowed in entirety; judgment entered for the applicant.
- Judges
- ["E Ominde"]
- Legal Topics
- Adoption of Certificate of Costs as Judgment, Unopposed Application, Interest on Certified Costs, Taxation of Advocate Client Bill
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Onyinkwa & D. Onyinkwa t/a Onyinkwa & Co
Applicant
Monarch Insurance Company Ltd
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Advocates' Remuneration / Certificate of Costs Adoption as Judgment / Ruling on Unopposed Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the certificate of costs should be adopted as the judgment and decree of the court
- 2 Whether interest at 14% per annum should accrue from the date of filing the advocate-client bill
- 3 Whether the applicant was entitled to costs of the application
Ratio Decidendi
The application was unopposed, the respondent had been duly served, and no challenge was raised against the certificate of costs. The court therefore allowed the application in full, entered judgment for the certified amount, awarded interest at 14% per annum from 8/8/2025, and granted the applicant costs of the application.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in entirety; judgment entered for the applicant.
Orders
- Judgment entered for the applicant against the respondent for Kshs. 180,900 being certified costs.
- Interest awarded on Kshs. 180,900 at 14% per annum from 8/8/2025 until payment in full.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
1 paragraphs
Onyinkwa t/a Onyinkwa & Co v Monarch Insurance Company Ltd (Civil Miscellaneous E155 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 7902 (KLR) (25 May 2026) (Ruling) Neutral citation: [2026] KEHC 7902 (KLR) Republic of Kenya In the High Court at Bungoma Civil Miscellaneous E155 of 2025 E Ominde, J May 25, 2026 Between Onyinkwa & D. Onyinkwa t/a Onyinkwa & Co Applicant and Monarch Insurance Company Ltd Respondent Ruling 1.Before this court is an Application by the Applicant dated 13th April 2026 brought Under Section 51(2) of the Advocates Act Chapter 16 and Paragraph 7 of the Advocates Remuneration (Amendment) Order, 2014, Sections 1A, 1B, 2, 3, 3A Civil Procedure Act, Order 51 of the Civil Procedure Rules and all enabling provisions of the Law seeking the following orders:a.That this Honourable court be pleased to order that the Certificate of Costs issued to the Applicant, as against the Respondent, be converted and/or adopted as the judgment and decree of this Court and consequently, a Judgment be entered for the applicant against the Respondent for Kshs. 180,900/=.b.That interest does accrue on the sum of Kshs. 180,900/= at the rate of 14% per annum, with effect from 8/8/2025 (the date of filing the Advocates-client bill of costs) until payment in full as prescribed under paragraph 7 of the Advocates Remuneration order.c.That costs of this application be provided for. 2.The application is supported by the grounds on the face of it and the Affidavit of Dennis Onyimbo Onyinkwa sworn on 13th April, 2026. 3.Counsel for the Applicant Ms. Muresia stated that the Application together with the order of the Court issued on 15th April 2026 were served via email on 16th April 2026. That the Affidavit of Service is filed and they have not received any response so far and she therefore prays for directions. 4.For reasons that the Respondent was served and they have not filed any response, and are also not present in court, the court then directed that the Applicant may proceed with their Application. 5.Counsel for the Applicant Ms. Muresia in her oral representations stated that because no response had been filed against the Certificate of Costs, their application be allowed as prayed. 6.I have considered the application dated 13th April, 2026 and the same having not been opposed, I now hereby allow the same in its entirety as follows: -a.That Judgment is now hereby entered in favor of the Applicant as against the Respondent for the sum of Kshs. 180,900/= being certified costs due to the applicant as against the Respondent.b.That interest does accrue on the sum of Kshs. 180,900/= at the rate of 14% per annum, with effect from 8/8/2025 (the date of filing the Advocates-client bill of costs) until payment in full as prescribed under paragraph 7 of the Advocates Remuneration order.c.That costs of this application is awarded to the Applicant and be borne by the Respondent. READ DATED AND SIGNED AT BUNGOMA ON 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2026E. OMINDEJUDGE