[2022] KEELRC 13267 (KLR)

[2022] KEELRC 13267 (KLR)

The court found that the claim for salary arrears was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, as the alleged arrears accrued more than three years before the suit was filed. The claims for underpayment of wages and leave allowance failed because the claimant did not specify the relevant periods,...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEELRC 13267 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Livingstone Kisali Onzere; Respondent: Jebrok Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd; Respondent: Daniel Agonya Onzere; Respondent: Levy Chore Lundu; Respondent: Buffalo Kinyaga
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause 322 of 2016
Procedural Posture
Employment Cause / Judgment
Outcome
claim dismissed
Judges
S Radido
Legal Topics
Breach of Employment Contract, Salary Arrears, Underpayment of Wages, Leave Allowance, Statutory Contributions
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Breach of Employment Contract Salary Arrears Underpayment of Wages Leave Allowance Statutory Contributions

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Livingstone Kisali Onzere

Applicant

Jebrok Farmers Co-operative Society Ltd

Respondent

Daniel Agonya Onzere

Respondent

Levy Chore Lundu

Respondent

Buffalo Kinyaga

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Employment Cause / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the claim for salary arrears was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007.
  2. 2 Whether the claimant proved entitlement to underpayment of wages.
  3. 3 Whether the claimant was entitled to leave allowance under the law or contract.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the claim for salary arrears was time-barred under section 90 of the Employment Act, 2007, as the alleged arrears accrued more than three years before the suit was filed. The claims for underpayment of wages and leave allowance failed because the claimant did not specify the relevant periods, amounts, or legal basis for such claims. The claim for NSSF contributions was dismissed due to lack of evidence of registration or entitlement. The claimant, despite the matter being undefended, failed to discharge the burden of proof required to establish the claims on a balance of probabilities. Consequently, the entire cause was dismissed for lack of proof to the required...

Court Disposition

claim dismissed

Orders

  • The entire cause is dismissed for lack of proof to the required standard.