[2024] KEELC 5681 (KLR)

[2024] KEELC 5681 (KLR)

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to cease acting for the 8th defendant, as the 8th defendant had not properly given instructions and had already instructed another firm of advocates. The application was unopposed, and the court was satisfied that the requirements for leave to...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] KEELC 5681 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Moses Ochieng Opado; Defendant: Vincent Warindu Ongong'a & 9 others; Defendant: Penina Odero; Applicant: The Firm of Kisaka and Associates Advocates
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Homa Bay
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 24 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Advocate's Application to Cease Acting
Outcome
Application allowed. Leave granted to the applicant to cease acting for the 8th defendant. Costs in the cause.
Judges
GMA Ongondo
Legal Topics
Advocate Ceasing to Act, Leave to Withdraw, Representation of Parties
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Advocate Ceasing to Act Leave to Withdraw Representation of Parties

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Moses Ochieng Opado

Plaintiff

Vincent Warindu Ongong'a & 9 others

Defendant

Penina Odero

Defendant

The Firm of Kisaka and Associates Advocates

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Advocate's Application to Cease Acting

  1. 1 Whether the applicant should be granted leave to cease acting for the 8th defendant.
  2. 2 Whether the 8th defendant has properly instructed new counsel.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the applicant had demonstrated sufficient grounds to cease acting for the 8th defendant, as the 8th defendant had not properly given instructions and had already instructed another firm of advocates. The application was unopposed, and the court was satisfied that the requirements for leave to cease acting had been met. Accordingly, the court allowed the application and granted leave to the applicant to cease acting for the 8th defendant. Costs of the application were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Application allowed. Leave granted to the applicant to cease acting for the 8th defendant. Costs in the cause.

Orders

  • Leave is granted to the applicant to cease acting for the 8th defendant as sought.
  • Costs of the application to be in the cause.