[2023] KEHC 3159 (KLR)

[2023] KEHC 3159 (KLR)

The court found that there was no merit in the application because there was no evidence that the period spent in custody during trial had not already been considered or that the applicant was serving another undisclosed sentence. The application was therefore dismissed and the file closed.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEHC 3159 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Vincent Onyango Opany; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Kisumu
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Miscellaneous Criminal Application E094 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling
Outcome
application dismissed
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Credit for Time Served, Malicious Damage to Property
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentencing Credit for Time Served Malicious Damage to Property

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Vincent Onyango Opany

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Criminal Application / Ruling

  1. 1 Whether the applicant is entitled to have the period spent in custody during trial considered in his sentence.
  2. 2 Whether there is merit in the application to review the sentence based on time already served.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that there was no merit in the application because there was no evidence that the period spent in custody during trial had not already been considered or that the applicant was serving another undisclosed sentence. The application was therefore dismissed and the file closed.

Court Disposition

application dismissed

Orders

  • The application filed on September 21, 2022 is dismissed.
  • If the applicant is still in prison, he is to be notified of this decision.