[2024] KEHC 13386 (KLR)
The High Court found that it had already dealt with the applicant's sentence both at the initial appeal and in a subsequent application challenging the constitutionality of the sentence, which was dismissed. The court held that it was functus officio and lacked jurisdiction to entertain a further application for...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] KEHC 13386 (KLR)
- Parties
- Applicant: Julius Oduor Opondi; Respondent: Republic
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Siaya
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Miscellaneous Criminal Petition 37 of 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Miscellaneous Criminal Petition / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- application dismissed
- Judges
- DK Kemei
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Review, Functus Officio, Appellate Jurisdiction, Sexual Offences
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Julius Oduor Opondi
Applicant
Republic
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Criminal Petition / Ruling on Application for Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to review the applicant's sentence after having already resentenced him on appeal.
- 2 Whether the application for further sentence reduction is merited in light of previous decisions.
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court found that it had already dealt with the applicant's sentence both at the initial appeal and in a subsequent application challenging the constitutionality of the sentence, which was dismissed. The court held that it was functus officio and lacked jurisdiction to entertain a further application for review of the sentence. The applicant's failure to seek redress in the Court of Appeal, as required, further undermined his application. Accordingly, the application for further sentence reduction was dismissed for lack of merit.
Court Disposition
application dismissed
Orders
- The application dated 12/4/2023 is dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
22 paragraphs
Opondi v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Petition 37 of 2023) [2024] KEHC 13386 (KLR) (31 October 2024) (Ruling)
Neutral citation: [2024] KEHC 13386 (KLR)
Republic of Kenya
In the High Court at Siaya
Miscellaneous Criminal Petition 37 of 2023
DK Kemei, J
October 31, 2024
Between
Julius Oduor Opondi
Applicant
and
Republic
Respondent
(Being an application arising from judgment, conviction and sentence in Ukwala SRM’s Court Sexual Case No. 20 of 2018 delivered on 13/8/2018 by Hon. G. A. Adhiambo , Senior Resident Magistrate AND Siaya High Court Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 2018)
Ruling
1. The applicant herein has filed an application dated 12th April, 2023 principally seeking for a review of sentence.
2. The applicant’s gravamen is inter alia; that he was convicted and sentenced to serve life imprisonment vide Ukwala Sexual Offence Case No. 20 of 2018; that he lodged an appeal at Siaya High Court vide Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 2018 wherein his sentence was reviewed to a period of 75 years imprisonment; that the said sentence is still harsh and excessive yet the applicant was a first offender who is now reformed and rehabilitated; that the applicant has undergone various spiritual courses; that the sentence of 75 years be reduced to a lesser sentence or any other that the court may deem fit and just.
3. There was no response by the respondent to the application.
4. I have given due consideration to the application. It is not disputed that the applicant was duly convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment vide Ukwala SRM’s Court Sexual Offence Case No. 20 of 2018. It is also not in dispute that the applicant lodged an appeal to this court vide Criminal Appeal No. 40 of 2018 which was duly considered and that he was re-sentenced to serve 75 years imprisonment. It is also not in dispute that the applicant later on filed an application No. 116 of 2022 at Siaya High Court wherein he sought to challenge the sentence of 75 years imprisonment as being unconstitutional and which was dismissed by Justice Aburili. On 23/9/2022, the learned judge found the applicant’s quest for a further resentencing lacked merit. That being the position, I find the singular issue for determining is whether the application has merit.
5. It is clear that the applicant is playing lottery with the courts. Indeed, when this court resentenced him to 75 years imprisonment, this court became functus officio and that the applicant ought to have moved to the Court of Appeal for redress if he felt aggrieved by the sentence imposed. The applicant has not given reasons as to why he has not moved to the Court of Appeal rather betrays him on his quest to try and receive audience before this court despite having been attended to on two occasions. This court has already substantively dealt with the issue of sentence and thus by seeking further revision from this court, the applicant is asking this court to sit on appeal on its own decision. This court is already functus officio.
6. In view of the foregoing observations it is my finding that the applicant’s application dated 12/4/2023 lacks merit. The same is dismissed.
DATED, SIGNED AND DELIVERED THIS 31STDAY OF OCTOBER, 2024. D. KEMEIJUDGEIn the presence of:Julius Apondi ApplicantMs. Kerubo for RespondentOgendo Court Assistant