[2022] KECA 801 (KLR)

[2022] KECA 801 (KLR)

The Court of Appeal found that the High Court erred in setting aside its own judgment delivered on 1st July 2022 in Civil (Election) Appeal No. E413 of 2022. The appellate court held that the High Court was functus officio after delivering its judgment and lacked jurisdiction to revisit or alter the decision except...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KECA 801 (KLR)
Parties
Appellant: Orange Democratic Movement; Respondent: Joseph Ouma Dhonji; Respondent: Shadrack Machanje Namunyu; Respondent: Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission; Respondent: Catherine Mumma; Appellant: Catherine Mumma; Interested Party: Shadrack Machanje Namunyu; Interested Party: Orange Democratic Party
Court
Court of Appeal
Court Station
Court of Appeal at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Civil Appeal E459 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeals allowed; High Court orders set aside; original judgment reinstated; each party to bear own costs
Judges
DK Musinga, F Sichale, S ole Kantai
Legal Topics
Appeal Procedure, Election Nomination Disputes, Setting Aside Orders
Source Language
en
Election Petitions Civil Procedure Appeal Procedure Election Nomination Disputes Setting Aside Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Orange Democratic Movement

Appellant

Joseph Ouma Dhonji

Respondent

Shadrack Machanje Namunyu

Respondent

Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission

Respondent

Catherine Mumma

Respondent

Catherine Mumma

Appellant

Shadrack Machanje Namunyu

Interested Party

Orange Democratic Party

Interested Party

Procedural Posture

Civil Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the High Court erred in setting aside its earlier judgment in Civil (Election) Appeal No. E413 of 2022.
  2. 2 Whether the original judgment delivered on 1st July 2022 should be reinstated.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court of Appeal found that the High Court erred in setting aside its own judgment delivered on 1st July 2022 in Civil (Election) Appeal No. E413 of 2022. The appellate court held that the High Court was functus officio after delivering its judgment and lacked jurisdiction to revisit or alter the decision except as provided by law. The orders issued on 18th July 2022 were therefore irregular and without legal foundation. Consequently, the Court of Appeal allowed the appeals, set aside the ruling and orders of 18th July 2022, and reinstated the original judgment of 1st July 2022. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.

Court Disposition

appeals allowed; High Court orders set aside; original judgment reinstated; each party to bear own costs

Orders

  • The appeals are allowed.
  • The ruling and orders of Sergon, J. in Civil (Election) Appeal No. E413 of 2022 given on 18th July 2022 are set aside.