[2013] KEHC 5189 (KLR)
The court held that section 13 of the Elections Act does not permit the reopening or amendment of a party's list of nominated candidates after submission, except in the limited circumstances expressly provided by law. The court further found that parties whose rights would be affected by any alteration to the list...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2013] KEHC 5189 (KLR)
- Parties
- Petitioner: Orange Democratic Movement; Respondent: The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
- Court
- High Court
- Court Station
- High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Petition 48 of 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Election Petition / Judgment
- Outcome
- petition dismissed
- Judges
- DAS Majanja, CC Kipkorir, GV Odunga
- Legal Topics
- Candidate Nomination, Party Lists, Election Deadlines, Electoral Commission Powers
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Orange Democratic Movement
Petitioner
The Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Election Petition / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondent is obliged to accept and confirm the petitioner's revised list of candidates after the statutory deadline.
- 2 Whether section 13 of the Elections Act permits amendment or reopening of a party list after submission.
- 3 Whether affected parties must be served before the court can make orders altering the candidate list.
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that section 13 of the Elections Act does not permit the reopening or amendment of a party's list of nominated candidates after submission, except in the limited circumstances expressly provided by law. The court further found that parties whose rights would be affected by any alteration to the list must be served and given an opportunity to be heard. The preparation and correction of candidate lists is primarily a matter for the political party, not the electoral commission, and minor errors can be addressed by Returning Officers during the nomination process. Accordingly, the petition was dismissed, with the only order being that the respondent correct minor spelling...
Court Disposition
petition dismissed
Orders
- Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs.
- IEBC is directed to correct spelling mistakes or minor errors in respect of the names present on the list by the petitioner.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
30 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
High Court at Nairobi (Nairobi Law Courts)
Petition 48 of 2013 [if !mso]> <style> v:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} o:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} w:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);} .shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);} </style> <![endif][if gte mso 9]><xml>
Normal 0
false false false
EN-ZA X-NONE X-NONE
</xml><![endif][if gte mso 9]><![endif][if gte mso 10]> <style> /* Style Definitions */ table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; mso-style-parent:""; text-align:justify; text-indent:-17. 85pt; line-height:200%; font-size:11. 0pt;"Calibri","sans-serif"; mso-bidi-"Times New Roman";} </style> <![endif]
ORANGE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT ........................................................................PETITIONER
AND
THE INDEPENDENT ELECTORALAND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION................RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
1. After hearing the matter on 1st February 2013, we made the following decision, “Petition is dismissed with no order as to costs save that IEBC is directed to correct spelling mistakes or minor errors in respect of the names present on the list by the petitioner. For the avoidance of doubt, there should be no replacement or addition of names to be submitted.”
2. The petitioner, the Orange Democratic Movement in its petition dated 30th January 2013 seeks an order that, “A declaration that respondent accept, receive and confirm the petitioner’s list of candidates annexed to the supporting affidavit of Professor Peter Anyang’ Nyong’o sworn on 30th January 2013).
3. According to the petitioner, it complied with the deadline set by the respondents in submitting its list of candidates when it submitted its list on 21st January 2013 when it discovered that the list contained certain errors and or omitted names of numerous candidates.
4. The respondent opposes the application on the basis of the provisions of section 13 of the Election Act which provides;
13. (1) A political party shall nominate its candidates for an election under this Act at least forty-five days before a general election under this Act in accordance with its constitution and nomination rules.
(2) A political party shall not change the candidate nominated after the nomination of that person has been received by the Commission:
Provided that in the event of the death, resignation or incapacity of the nominated candidate or of the violation of the electoral code of conduct by the nominated candidate, the political party may after notifying the candidate that the party seeks to substitute, where applicable, substitute its candidate before the date of presentation of nomination papers to the Commission.
(3) Notwithstanding subsection (1), in the case of any other election, the Commission shall by notice in the prescribed form, specify the day or days upon which political parties shall nominate candidates to contest in a presidential, parliamentary or county election in accordance with its constitution or rules, which shall not be more than twenty-one days after the date of publication of such notice.
The respondent’s position is that the section 13 does not permit re-opening of the list forwarded to the party.
5. In our view, a consideration of the case requires that parties affected be served in order to contest the fact of whether they are on this list or not. Furthermore, parties on the list have now acquired specific rights to contest the election on an ODM ticket and it would be improper to make orders without serving the parties affected.
6. We are also convinced that the matter of preparation of lists is really a matter for the party and not IEBC and if there are minor errors, the respective Returning Officers receiving nomination papers will no doubt give attention to this fact.
7. In view of our findings, it is not necessary to make a finding as to whether the list submitted under section 13 of the Elections Act can be amended.
DatedandDelivered at Nairobithis 5th February 2013
D.S. MAJANJA
JUDGE
W. KORIR
JUDGE
G. V. ODUNGA
JUDGE