[2022] KEHC 16772 (KLR)

[2022] KEHC 16772 (KLR)

The court declined to revise the sentence because the applicant had denied the offence, absconded bail, was sentenced in absentia, and there was no evidence of remorse or reform. The court found no justification to interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial court, holding that the applicant was not suitable...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2022] KEHC 16772 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Samson Ochieng Orawo; Respondent: Republic
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Siaya
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Criminal Revision E124 of 2022
Procedural Posture
Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision
Outcome
Application for sentence revision dismissed. Sentence of 3 years imprisonment upheld.
Judges
RE Aburili
Legal Topics
Sentence Revision, Obtaining Money by False Pretences, Bail Jumping
Source Language
en
Criminal Law Sentence Revision Obtaining Money by False Pretences Bail Jumping

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Samson Ochieng Orawo

Applicant

Republic

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Revision / Ruling on Application for Sentence Revision

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant for obtaining money by false pretences should be revised.
  2. 2 Whether the applicant is suitable for a non-custodial sentence.

Ratio Decidendi

The court declined to revise the sentence because the applicant had denied the offence, absconded bail, was sentenced in absentia, and there was no evidence of remorse or reform. The court found no justification to interfere with the sentence imposed by the trial court, holding that the applicant was not suitable for a non-custodial sentence under the circumstances.

Court Disposition

Application for sentence revision dismissed. Sentence of 3 years imprisonment upheld.

Orders

  • Application for sentence revision is declined.
  • File closed.