[2023] KEELRC 1322 (KLR)

[2023] KEELRC 1322 (KLR)

The court held that while Gazette Notice No. 6024 of 2018 confers jurisdiction to Magistrates of the rank of Senior Resident Magistrate and above to hear employment disputes where the employee's gross monthly pay does not exceed KSh. 80,000, it does not strip the Employment and Labour Relations Court of its residual...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELRC 1322 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Bernard Odhiambo Oriawo; Respondent: KK Security Services Limited
Court
Employment and Labour Relations Court
Court Station
Employment and Labour Relations Court at Nairobi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Cause E624 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Jurisdiction
Outcome
Suit transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Milimani Commercial Law Courts; costs in the cause.
Judges
Nzioki wa Makau
Legal Topics
Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Transfer of Suit, Magistrates Courts Powers
Source Language
en
Employment and Labour Pecuniary Jurisdiction Transfer of Suit Magistrates Courts Powers

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Bernard Odhiambo Oriawo

Applicant

KK Security Services Limited

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Preliminary Objection / Ruling on Jurisdiction

  1. 1 Whether the Employment and Labour Relations Court has pecuniary jurisdiction to hear claims where the employee's gross monthly pay does not exceed KSh. 80,000.
  2. 2 Whether the suit should be struck out or transferred to the Magistrates Court.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that while Gazette Notice No. 6024 of 2018 confers jurisdiction to Magistrates of the rank of Senior Resident Magistrate and above to hear employment disputes where the employee's gross monthly pay does not exceed KSh. 80,000, it does not strip the Employment and Labour Relations Court of its residual jurisdiction. The claimant ought to have filed the suit at the Magistrates Court, but this irregularity is not fatal to the suit. Instead of striking out the proceedings, the court exercised its discretion to transfer the suit to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Milimani Commercial Law Courts for hearing and disposal. Costs of the application will be in the cause.

Court Disposition

Suit transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Milimani Commercial Law Courts; costs in the cause.

Orders

  • The suit is transferred to the Chief Magistrate’s Court at Milimani Commercial Law Courts for hearing and disposal.
  • Costs of the application shall be costs in the cause.