[2015] KEELC 238 (KLR)
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove lawful acquisition of Chembe/Kibabamshe/318. The evidence established that the defendant was the original registered owner, and there was no proof of his death at the time of the alleged transmission to Maingi Mwaro Ngoka. The purported transfer by way of succession...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2015] KEELC 238 (KLR)
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Ornato Orazio; Defendant: Bernard Baya Mwaro; Plaintiff: Bernard Baya Mwaro; Defendant: Ornato Orazio; Defendant: Maingi Mwaro Ngoka; Defendant: Benny Tourist Enterprises; Defendant: The Registrar of Lands Kilifi District; Defendant: The Commissioner of Lands
- Court
- Environment and Land Court
- Court Station
- Environment and Land Court at Malindi
- Jurisdiction
- Kenya
- Case Number
- Environment & Land Case 5 of 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Case / Judgment
- Outcome
- Defendant's counterclaim allowed; plaintiff's suit dismissed.
- Judges
- OA Angote
- Legal Topics
- Fraudulent Transfer, Land Registration, Ownership Dispute
- Source Language
- en
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Ornato Orazio
Plaintiff
Bernard Baya Mwaro
Defendant
Bernard Baya Mwaro
Plaintiff
Ornato Orazio
Defendant
Maingi Mwaro Ngoka
Defendant
Benny Tourist Enterprises
Defendant
The Registrar of Lands Kilifi District
Defendant
The Commissioner of Lands
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the plaintiff lawfully acquired title to Chembe/Kibabamshe/318.
- 2 Whether the transfer of the suit property from the defendant to third parties was fraudulent and unlawful.
- 3 Whether the defendant remains the lawful proprietor of the suit property.
Ratio Decidendi
The court found that the plaintiff failed to prove lawful acquisition of Chembe/Kibabamshe/318. The evidence established that the defendant was the original registered owner, and there was no proof of his death at the time of the alleged transmission to Maingi Mwaro Ngoka. The purported transfer by way of succession was therefore fraudulent, as Maingi Mwaro Ngoka was neither related to nor a beneficiary of the defendant. All subsequent transfers, including to Benny Tourist Enterprises and ultimately to the plaintiff, were tainted by this initial fraud. The court held that the defendant remains the lawful proprietor, and the plaintiff's title is invalid.
Court Disposition
Defendant's counterclaim allowed; plaintiff's suit dismissed.
Orders
- The transfer of Chembe/Kibabamshe/318 from the defendant to Maingi Mwaro Ngoka and subsequently to the plaintiff is declared fraudulent and unlawful.
- The defendant, Bernard Baya Mwaro, is declared the lawful proprietor of Chembe/Kibabamshe/318.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
40 paragraphs
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE ENVIRONMENT AND LAND COURT
AT MALINDI
ELC CIVIL CASE NO.5 OF 2004
ORNATO ORAZIO...........................................................PLAINTIFF
=VERSUS=
BERNARD BAYA MWARO............................................DEFENDANT
AND
BY WAY OF COUNTER CLAIM
BERNARD BAYA MWARO......................................................................PLAINTIFF
=VERSUS=
1. ORNATO ORAZIO
2. MAINGI MWARO NGOKA
3. BENNY TOURIST ENTERPRISES
4. THE REGISTRAR OF LANDS KILIFI DISTRICT
5. THE COMMISSIONER OF LANDS............................................DEFENDANTS
J U D G M E N T
Introduction
1. In the Amended Plaint dated 4th April 2009, the Plaintiff is praying for a declaration that he is the proprietor of land known as Chembe/Kibabamshe/318 (the suit property.)
2. The Plaintiff has averred in the Plaint that he purchased the suit property from Benny Tourist Enterprises Limited and that the land was transferred to him on 20th July 1994. He was then issued with a title deed on 16th August 1994.
3. In his Defence and Counter-claim, the Defendant averred that he is the registered owner of the suit property having been registered as such on 24th March 1983; that the Plaintiff fraudulently obtained the title deed in respect to the suit property and that Maingi Mwaro Ngoka, the 2nd Defendant in the counterclaim misrepresented to the District Registrar of Lands that the Defendant died in 1994
The Plaintiff's case:
4. When the matter came up for hearing on 17th May 2011, the Plaintiff's advocate prayed for an adjournment which was disallowed by the court.
5. In the absence of the Plaintiff and his witnesses, the Plaintiff's suit was dismissed with costs. The matter proceeded for the hearing of the Defendant's counterclaim.
The Defendant's case:
6. DW1 informed the court that the Defendant is his son and that he is based abroad. DW1 produced the general Power of Attorney in which he was appointed to act for the Defendant in these proceedings.
7. DW1 informed the court that the Defendant was allocated the suit property in 1977 and was subsequently issued with the Title Deed. The copy of the Title Deed was produced in evidence as DEXB2.
8. However, later on, he discovered that someone was dealing with the suit property. It was the evidence of DW1 that when he inquired from the District Land Registrar, he was informed that the suit property had been transferred to one Mwangi Mwaru Ngoka after it was said that the Defendant had died.
9. DW1 stated that the Defendant is still alive and is in possession of the original Title Deed in respect to the suit property.
10. The Defendant's advocate did not file any submissions but relied on the evidence on record.
Analysis and findings:
11. The Plaintiff's allegations that he is the registered proprietor of land known as Chembe/Kibabamshe 318 were not proved. Indeed, the Plaintiff's suit was dismissed by the court for want of prosecution.
12. On the other hand, the Defendant's representative, DW1, produced in evidence the green card showing that the register for Chembe/Kibabamshe/318 was opened on 30th August 1977 with the Defendant as the first registered owner of the land.
13. The green card shows that the Defendant was issued with the Land Certificate on 24th March 1983 before the same was transfered to one Mwangi Mwaru Ngoka by way of Succession on 22nd June 1993. The said Mwangi Mwaru Ngoka then transferred the suit property to Benny Tourist Enterprises who sold the land to the Plaintiff.
14. There is no evidence before me to show that as at 22nd June 1993, the Defendant was dead to allow Mwangi Mwaru Ngoka to be registered as the owner of the suit property by transmission. Indeed the said Mwangi Mwaru Ngoka is not related to the Defendant and could not have been a beneficiary of his estate, even if he was dead.
15. In the circumstances, I find and hold that the Transfer of the suit property from the Defendant to Mwangi Mwaru Ngoka and the Plaintiff was fraudulent and unlawful.
16. Consequently, I allow the Defendant's Counter-claim dated 20th June, 2005.
Dated and delivered in Malindi this 2nd day of October2015.
O. A. Angote
Judge