[2014] KEELC 93 (KLR)

[2014] KEELC 93 (KLR)

The court found that on the date the Defendant's counterclaim was dismissed for want of prosecution and non-attendance, the matter scheduled for hearing was the Plaintiff's advocate's application to cease acting, not the counterclaim itself. Therefore, the Defendant or his advocate was not obliged to attend court...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2014] KEELC 93 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Ornato Orzazio; Defendant: Benard Baya Mwaro
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Malindi
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 5 of 2004
Procedural Posture
Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal of Counterclaim
Outcome
Defendant's application to set aside the dismissal of the counterclaim allowed.
Judges
OA Angote
Legal Topics
Dismissal for Want of Prosecution, Counterclaim Reinstatement, Non Attendance, Setting Aside Orders
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Land and Property Dismissal for Want of Prosecution Counterclaim Reinstatement Non Attendance Setting Aside Orders

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Ornato Orzazio

Plaintiff

Benard Baya Mwaro

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Case / Ruling on Application to Set Aside Dismissal of Counterclaim

  1. 1 Whether the dismissal of the Defendant's counterclaim for want of prosecution and non-attendance was proper in the circumstances.
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant's application to set aside the dismissal of the counterclaim should be allowed.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that on the date the Defendant's counterclaim was dismissed for want of prosecution and non-attendance, the matter scheduled for hearing was the Plaintiff's advocate's application to cease acting, not the counterclaim itself. Therefore, the Defendant or his advocate was not obliged to attend court for the counterclaim on that day. The court acknowledged its error in dismissing the counterclaim instead of the Plaintiff's application. Consequently, the court allowed the Defendant's application to set aside the dismissal, reinstated the counterclaim, and directed the Defendant to set down the Plaintiff's application for hearing, followed by the counterclaim.

Court Disposition

Defendant's application to set aside the dismissal of the counterclaim allowed.

Orders

  • The Defendant's application dated 3rd September 2014 is allowed as prayed.
  • The Defendant is directed to set down the Plaintiff's Application dated 28th March 2012 for hearing and thereafter the Counterclaim.