[2023] KEELC 17765 (KLR)

[2023] KEELC 17765 (KLR)

The court found that the Bill of Costs should be reassessed in accordance with the value of the subject matter, which was 16.3 hectares (40.75 acres) of land valued at Kshs. 40,750,000. Applying the Remuneration Order, the court determined the instruction fee for the first Kshs. 1 million at Kshs. 120,000 and for...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2023] KEELC 17765 (KLR)
Parties
Plaintiff: Alfred Nyabuti Orori (Suing for and on behalf of the Estate of Jeremiah Orori Nyamwaro (Deceased)); Defendant: Alex Nyamwaro Nyakambi (Sued as the administrator of the Estate of Nyakambi Nyamwaro (Deceased))
Court
Environment and Land Court
Court Station
Environment and Land Court at Nyamira
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Environment & Land Case 63 of 2021
Procedural Posture
Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application for Reassessment of Bill of Costs
Outcome
Application for reassessment of Bill of Costs allowed in part; Bill of Costs varied as per the court's reassessment.
Judges
JM Kamau
Legal Topics
Bill of Costs Assessment, Joint Ownership of Land, Injunctions, Instruction Fees, Land Transfer Disputes
Source Language
en
Land and Property Civil Procedure Bill of Costs Assessment Joint Ownership of Land Injunctions Instruction Fees Land Transfer Disputes

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 6
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Alfred Nyabuti Orori (Suing for and on behalf of the Estate of Jeremiah Orori Nyamwaro (Deceased))

Plaintiff

Alex Nyamwaro Nyakambi (Sued as the administrator of the Estate of Nyakambi Nyamwaro (Deceased))

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Environment and Land Case / Ruling on Application for Reassessment of Bill of Costs

  1. 1 Whether the Bill of Costs dated 19/09/2022 and delivered on 31/10/2022 should be reassessed and varied as requested by both parties.
  2. 2 Whether the instruction fees and other items in the Bill of Costs were properly assessed in accordance with the Remuneration Order.
  3. 3 Whether the Plaintiff or Defendant is entitled to the reliefs sought in their respective claims regarding the land parcel Kerumbe Farm 940/19.

Ratio Decidendi

The court found that the Bill of Costs should be reassessed in accordance with the value of the subject matter, which was 16.3 hectares (40.75 acres) of land valued at Kshs. 40,750,000. Applying the Remuneration Order, the court determined the instruction fee for the first Kshs. 1 million at Kshs. 120,000 and for the remaining Kshs. 39,750,000 at Kshs. 596,250, enhancing the total to Kshs. 850,000. The getting up fee was set at Kshs. 283,300 (one-third of Kshs. 716,250). The court also awarded Kshs. 10,000 for the application for injunction (Item 12), and Kshs. 7,500 each for Items 37 and 40. The court exercised its discretion to vary the costs in line with the value and complexity of the...

Court Disposition

Application for reassessment of Bill of Costs allowed in part; Bill of Costs varied as per the court's reassessment.

Orders

  • Instruction fee set at Kshs. 850,000.
  • Getting up fee set at Kshs. 283,300.