[2020] KEHC 2988 (KLR)

[2020] KEHC 2988 (KLR)

The High Court found that the counterclaim in the Amended Defence exceeded Ksh.38,571,119.72, which is beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate's Court as set by statute. Since the Respondent did not oppose the application and the affidavit of service confirmed proper service, the court determined...

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2020] KEHC 2988 (KLR)
Parties
Applicant: Orthodox Archbishopric of Kenya & Irinoupolis; Respondent: Energy Regulatory Commission
Court
High Court
Court Station
High Court at Nairobi (Milimani Law Courts)
Jurisdiction
Kenya
Case Number
Children Miscellaneous Application 188 of 2020
Procedural Posture
Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit and Validation of Amended Defence and Counterclaim
Outcome
application allowed
Judges
BT Jaden
Legal Topics
Transfer of Suit, Pecuniary Jurisdiction, Counterclaim, Amended Pleadings
Source Language
en
Civil Procedure Transfer of Suit Pecuniary Jurisdiction Counterclaim Amended Pleadings

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Orthodox Archbishopric of Kenya & Irinoupolis

Applicant

Energy Regulatory Commission

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Miscellaneous Application / Ruling on Application for Transfer of Suit and Validation of Amended Defence and Counterclaim

  1. 1 Whether the suit should be transferred from the Chief Magistrate's Court to the High Court due to pecuniary jurisdiction.
  2. 2 Whether the Amended Defence and Counterclaim should be deemed as duly filed and served.

Ratio Decidendi

The High Court found that the counterclaim in the Amended Defence exceeded Ksh.38,571,119.72, which is beyond the pecuniary jurisdiction of the Chief Magistrate's Court as set by statute. Since the Respondent did not oppose the application and the affidavit of service confirmed proper service, the court determined that it was appropriate to transfer the suit to the High Court for trial and determination. The court also deemed the Amended Defence and Counterclaim as duly filed and served, as prayed by the applicant. Costs were ordered to be in the cause.

Court Disposition

application allowed

Orders

  • The suit Nairobi CMCC 4768 of 2017 Energy Regulatory Commission v Orthodox Archbishopric of Kenya and Irinoupolis is transferred from the Chief Magistrate's Court to the High Court for trial and determination.
  • The Amended Defence and Counterclaim are deemed as duly filed and served.